I understand your problem, that question is pretty hard. But I found some information that I think you should read. This can get your problem done quickly.
Please hit that thank you button if that helped, I don’t want thank you’s I just want to know that this helped.
Please reply if this doesn’t help, I will try my best to gather more information or a answer.
Here is some good information that could help you out a lot!
Let’s begin by exploring some techniques astronomers use to study how galaxies are born and change over cosmic time. Suppose you wanted to understand how adult humans got to be the way they are. If you were very dedicated and patient, you could actually observe a sample of babies from birth, following them through childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood, and making basic measurements such as their heights, weights, and the proportional sizes of different parts of their bodies to understand how they change over time.
Unfortunately, we have no such possibility for understanding how galaxies grow and change over time: in a human lifetime—or even over the entire history of human civilization—individual galaxies change hardly at all. We need other tools than just patiently observing single galaxies in order to study and understand those long, slow changes.
We do, however, have one remarkable asset in studying galactic evolution. As we have seen, the universe itself is a kind of time machine that permits us to observe remote galaxies as they were long ago. For the closest galaxies, like the Andromeda galaxy, the time the light takes to reach us is on the order of a few hundred thousand to a few million years. Typically not much changes over times that short—individual stars in the galaxy may be born or die, but the overall structure and appearance of the galaxy will remain the same. But we have observed galaxies so far away that we are seeing them as they were when the light left them more than 10 billion years ago.
That is some information, I do have more if you need some! Thanks!
The diagram is missing; however, we know that the intensity of a sound wave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source: where I is the intensity and r is the distance from the source.
We can assume for instance that the initial distance from the source is r=1 m, so that we put The intensity at r=3 m will be Therefore, the sound intensity has decreased by a factor .
The answer is B frequency. When frequency increases more wave crests pass a fixed point each second. That means the wavelength shortens. So, as frequency increases, wavelength decreases
Under the assumption that the three rocks are dropped from the same height, they will hit the ground at the same speed. The gravity of Earth is virtually the same for any object that is small compared to the size of the Earth. The acceleration will change with the distance from the Earth, but this change is so small for the range of heights we work with (consider the range of heights from sea level to the tip of Mount Everest) that we can take the average value and assume it to be constant. This constant value of acceleration due to Earth's gravity is 9.80665m/s²
Because the objects fall under the same constant acceleration, they will hit the ground at the same speed.
