1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Makovka662 [10]
2 years ago
8

Find the Maclaurin series for f(x) using the definition of a Maclaurin series. [Assume that f has a power series expansion. Do n

ot show that Rn(x) → 0.] Find the associated radius of convergence R. f(x) = cos(3x)/5
Physics
1 answer:
jenyasd209 [6]2 years ago
3 0

The statement about pointwise convergence follows because C is a complete metric space. If fn → f uniformly on S, then |fn(z) − fm(z)| ≤ |fn(z) − f(z)| + |f(z) − fm(z)|, hence {fn} is uniformly Cauchy. Conversely, if {fn} is uniformly Cauchy, it is pointwise Cauchy and therefore converges pointwise to a limit function f. If |fn(z)−fm(z)| ≤ ε for all n,m ≥ N and all z ∈ S, let m → ∞ to show that |fn(z)−f(z)|≤εforn≥N andallz∈S. Thusfn →f uniformlyonS.

2. This is immediate from (2.2.7).

3. We have f′(x) = (2/x3)e−1/x2 for x ̸= 0, and f′(0) = limh→0(1/h)e−1/h2 = 0. Since f(n)(x) is of the form pn(1/x)e−1/x2 for x ̸= 0, where pn is a polynomial, an induction argument shows that f(n)(0) = 0 for all n. If g is analytic on D(0,r) and g = f on (−r,r), then by (2.2.16), g(z) =

You might be interested in
A deep space probe travels in a straight line at a constant speed of over 16,000 m/s. Assuming there is no friction in space, if
diamong [38]

Answer:

I believe that the answer is d.

Explanation:

Because there is nothing to make the aircraft accelerate or decelerate, it is going to stay in constant motion with no acceleration.

3 0
3 years ago
A 3.00 kg object is moving in the XY plane, with its x and y coordinates given by x = 5t³ !1 and y = 3t ² + 2, where x and y are
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

The net force acting on this object is 180.89 N.

Explanation:

Given that,

Mass = 3.00 kg

Coordinate of position of x= 5t^3+1

Coordinate of position of y=3t^2+2

Time = 2.00 s

We need to calculate the acceleration

a = \dfrac{d^2x}{dt^2}

For x coordinates

x=5t^3+1

On differentiate w.r.to t

\dfrac{dx}{dt}=15t^2+0

On differentiate again w.r.to t

\dfrac{d^2x}{dt^2}=30t

The acceleration in x axis at 2 sec

a = 60i

For y coordinates

y=3t^2+2

On differentiate w.r.to t

\dfrac{dy}{dt}=6t+0

On differentiate again w.r.to t

\dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2}=6

The acceleration in y axis at 2 sec

a = 6j

The acceleration is

a=60i+6j

We need to calculate the net force

F = ma

F = 3.00\times(60i+6j)

F=180i+18j

The magnitude of the force

|F|=\sqrt{(180)^2+(18)^2}

|F|=180.89\ N

Hence, The net force acting on this object is 180.89 N.

3 0
3 years ago
If I were to transmit a radio wave in our three dimensional world could a fourth dimensional “being” be able to receive it?
Morgarella [4.7K]
Depends. Are you talking about a mathematical 4th dimension (in which there is infinite dimensions) or some sort of etheral dimension (in which there is no scientific evidence for)

If you mean the first then yes. But it depends how these beings exist. From our understanding we only can theorize shapes in 4-d and if we assume that there is only one universe these "beings" arleady exist and thus any message in 3-d would be sent to them like a shadow ("flat").
If they exist in a alternate "plane" then you would need some method to transverse this plan and if u did, then we would easily be able to communicate, but we would at first sound like a wild animal. They either would ignore us, not understand or perceive us, or they would attempt to send back a signal (essential they are ET's)

IF you mean the second then thats some mystic stuff and its pretty creepy (although a fun read for me :P)
 
<span />
5 0
2 years ago
When two objects collide their momentum after the collision is explained by what
pashok25 [27]
The statement to every reacting there is, there is a opposite and same reacting. 
hope it helps
8 0
3 years ago
What do ocean waves and sound waves have in common?
Maksim231197 [3]
D. Both exhibit the same particle-to-particle interaction.Because disturbance is propagated with the help of particles. Other than this,[ <span>light waves are electromagnetic waves. ocean waves and sound waves are mechanical waves. they are able to transfer energy. electromagnetic wave and ocean waves are transverse waves while sound waves are the longitudinal wave. they show wave properties: reflection, refraction, diffraction, interference, and plane-polarization. longitudinal waves such as sound waves cannot be plane-polarized]. The one in the box shows different examples of waves with their examples. Hope it helps.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Luke pulls a sled using a force of 65 N for a distance of 25 m across level ground. The rope Luke pulls forms an angle of 25° wi
    12·2 answers
  • The internal energy of a material is determined by
    14·2 answers
  • If a block is in equilibrium the magnitude of the block's acceleration is
    8·2 answers
  • What is the free-throw line used for?
    5·1 answer
  • If an object is not moving, what do we know about the forces acting on it?
    11·2 answers
  • In which of the following situation is work being done?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the chemical formula for copper (I) sulfide? A) CuS B) CuS2 C) Cu2S D) Cu2S3
    7·2 answers
  • Explain how density differs from volume.
    7·1 answer
  • What is elastic potential energy and give and a example
    12·1 answer
  • Why is it important for coastal areas exposed to destructive forces to be aware of the effects of these forces?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!