All categories

2 years ago

I WILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST

Chemistry

2 answers:

PtichkaEL [24]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

guidelines

Explanation:

It gives perameters for her abilities :)

gayaneshka [121]2 years ago

3 0

I believe the answer would be purview, as its definition is “the scope of the influence or concerns of something.” It would be regarded as the capabilities of of that department. Please mark as Brainliest answer! :-)

You might be interested in

10. Which best explains why the total mass of the product(s) would be less than the total weight of the

Olegator [25]

Answer:

D. Gases were released to the atmosphere

Explanation:

In accordance to the law of conservation of mass, the total amount of reactants must equate the total amount of products at the end of the reaction because matter can not be lost or created. However, certain changes like gas evolution, formation of precipitate etc. indicates the occurrence of a chemical reaction.

In a chemical reaction, the total mass of the product(s) would be less than the total weight of the reactant(s) because GASES, which constituted part of the mass of the reaction, WERE RELEASED INTO THE ATMOSPHERE. However, if the mass of the gas released can be accounted for, the amount of reactants and products must balance.

4 0

2 years ago

REALLY NEED HELP. TAKING A TIMED TEST. 15 POINTS

zimovet [89]

The F atom . Oxygen has a -2 charge and fluorine has a +1 charge

7 0

2 years ago

Calculate the number of moles of an ideal gas if it occupies 1750 dm3 under 125,000 Pa at a temperature of 127 C.

Phoenix [80]

Hey there!

* Converts 1750 dm³ in liters :

1 dm³ = 1 L so 1750 dm³ = 1750 liters

* Convertes 125,000 Pa in atm :

1 Pa = 9.86*10⁻⁶ atm so 9.86*10⁻⁶ / 125,000 => 1.233 atm

* Convertes 127ºC in K :

127 + 273.15 => 400.15 K

R = 0.082 atm.L/mol.K

Finally, it uses an equation of clapeyron :

p * V = n * R * T

1.233 * 1750 = n * 0.082 * 400.15

2157.75 = n * 32.8123

n = 2157.75 / 32.8123

n = 65.76 moles

hope this helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

II. Ionic Equations

mario62 [17]

Answer:

Complete ionic: $\begin{aligned}& \rm 2\, Ag^{+}\, (aq) + 2\, {NO_3}^{-} \, (aq) + Ca^{2+}\, (aq) + 2\, Cl^{-}\, (aq) \\ & \rm \to 2\, AgCl\, (s) + Ca^{2+}\, (aq) + 2\, {NO_3}^{-}\, (aq)\end{aligned}$ .

Net ionic: $\begin{aligned}& \rm Ag^{+}\, (aq) + Cl^{-}\, (aq) \to AgCl\, (s)\end{aligned}$ .

Explanation:

Start by identifying species that exist as ions. In general, such species include:

Soluble salts.
Strong acids and strong bases.

All four species in this particular question are salts. However, only three of them are generally soluble in water: $\rm AgNO_3$ , $\rm CaCl_2$ , and $\rm Ca(NO_3)_2$ . These three salts will exist as ions:

Each $\rm AgNO_3\, (aq)$ formula unit will exist as one $\rm Ag^{+}$ ion and one $\rm {NO_3}^{-}$ ion.
Each $\rm CaCl_2$ formula unit will exist as one $\rm Ca^{2+}$ ion and two $\rm Cl^{-}$ ions (note the subscript in the formula $\rm CaCl_2\!$ .)
Each $\rm Ca(NO_3)_2$ formula unit will exist as one $\rm Ca^{2+}$ and two $\rm {NO_3}^{-}$ ions.

On the other hand, $\rm AgCl$ is generally insoluble in water. This salt will not form ions.

Rewrite the original chemical equation to get the corresponding ionic equation. In this question, rewrite $\rm AgNO_3$ , $\rm CaCl_2$ , and $\rm Ca(NO_3)_2$ (three soluble salts) as the corresponding ions.

Pay attention to the coefficient of each species. For example, indeed each $\rm AgNO_3\, (aq)$ formula unit will exist as only one $\rm Ag^{+}$ ion and one $\rm {NO_3}^{-}$ ion. However, because the coefficient of $\rm AgNO_3\, (aq)\!$ in the original equation is two, $\!\rm AgNO_3\, (aq)$ alone should correspond to two $\rm Ag^{+}\!$ ions and two $\rm {NO_3}^{-}\!$ ions.

Do not rewrite the salt $\rm AgCl$ because it is insoluble.

$\begin{aligned}& \rm 2\, Ag^{+}\, (aq) + 2\, {NO_3}^{-} \, (aq) + Ca^{2+}\, (aq) + 2\, Cl^{-}\, (aq) \\ & \rm \to 2\, AgCl\, (s) + Ca^{2+}\, (aq) + 2\, {NO_3}^{-}\, (aq)\end{aligned}$ .

Eliminate ions that are present on both sides of this ionic equation. In this question, such ions include one unit of $\rm Ca^{2+}$ and two units of $\rm {NO_3}^{-}$ . Doing so will give:

$\begin{aligned}& \rm 2\, Ag^{+}\, (aq) + 2\, Cl^{-}\, (aq) \to 2\, AgCl\, (s)\end{aligned}$ .

Simplify the coefficients:

$\begin{aligned}& \rm Ag^{+}\, (aq) + Cl^{-}\, (aq) \to AgCl\, (s)\end{aligned}$ .

7 0

2 years ago

b → p experiment number [a] (m) [b] (m) initial rate (m/s) 1 0.273 0.763 2.83 2 0.273 1.526 2.83 3 0.819 0.763 25.47 22) the rat

Mazyrski [523]

The rate law for this reaction is [A]².

Balanced chemical reaction used in this experiment: A + B → P

The reaction rate is the speed at which reactants are converted into products.

Comparing first and second experiment, there is no change in initial rate. The concentration of reactant B is increased by double. Initial rate does not depands on concentration of reactant B.

Comparing first and third experiment, initial rate is nine times greater, while concentration of reactant A is three times greater. Conclusion is that concentration of reactant A is squared and the rate is [A]².

More info about rate law: brainly.com/question/16981791

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago