Complete Question
Two different red-light-running signal systems were installed at various intersection locations with the goal of reducing angle-type crashes. Red-Light-Running System A resulted in 60% angle crashes over a sample of 720 total crashes. Red-Light-Running System B resulted in 52% angle crashes over a sample of 680 total crashes. Was there a difference between the proportions of angle crashes between the two red-light-running systems installed? Use an alpha of 0.10.
Answer:
Yes there is a difference between the proportions of angle crashes between the two red-light-running systems installed
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The first sample proportion is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc12c/bc12cb2379a8fc09ba1ecb851c9bf55d6b13ca7a" alt="\r p_ 1 = 0.60"
The second sample proportion is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61230/6123004b01c1a52c85fa4afa72f7bb1918d927b5" alt="p_2 = 0.52"
The first sample size is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2224e/2224e6e55c81f6ed2b023fe53c98e028d1132f00" alt="n_1 = 720"
The second sample size is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d95/a9d957952dd46f650cdabd09994c98823ae1ba6b" alt="n_2 = 680"
The level of significance is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16b7a/16b7ae09bd258043089f058bf2b0ba995cf8d109" alt="\alpha = 0.10"
The null hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7452a/7452ad0ad2303d84c25987c96609abbe8e69b040" alt="H_o : \r p_1 - \r p_2 = 0"
The alternative hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21dbe/21dbe19e27b397b5541c3a452936fd45855aa055" alt="H_a : \r p_1 - \r p_2 \ne 0"
Generally the pooled proportion is mathematically represented as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d33a1/d33a124cf5576f2eeff8568efbaef90f164a1cc6" alt="p_p = \frac{(\r p_1 * n_1 ) + (\r p_2 * n_2)}{n_1 + n_2 }"
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c2d/a1c2d7a8db87d8e8fbb439b839db8a0aaa63b6df" alt="p_p = \frac{(0.6 * 720) + ( 0.52 * 680)}{720 +680 }"
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e23/f4e2333b8de2ca04ebf0b10fafe4fef0732bbb14" alt="p_p = 0.56"
Generally the test statistics is evaluated as
![t = \frac{ ( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) - 0 }{ \sqrt{ (p_p (1- p_p) * [ \frac{1}{n_1 } + \frac{1}{n_2 } ])} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%20%20%3D%20%20%5Cfrac%7B%20%28%20%5Cr%20p_1%20%20-%20%5Cr%20p_2%20%29%20%20-%200%20%7D%7B%20%5Csqrt%7B%20%28p_p%20%20%281-%20p_p%29%20%20%2A%20%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_1%20%7D%20%2B%20%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_2%20%7D%20%20%5D%29%7D%20%7D)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e09a0/e09a075b510ec0320b57b7781dc907733584839e" alt="t = 3.0"
The p-value obtained from the z-table is
From the question we see that
so the null hypothesis is rejected
Hence we can conclude that there is a difference between the proportions