Answer:
The Hydrostatic force is 
The location of pressure center is 
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The height of the gate is 
The weight of the gate is 
The height of the water is 
The density of water is 
Note used 
for height of water and height of gate immersed by water since both have the same value
The area of the gate immersed in water is mathematically represented as
substituting values
The hydrostatic force is mathematically represented as
Where
So
The center of pressure is mathematically represented as
Where 
is the moment of inertia of the gate which mathematically represented as
The is the height of gate immersed in water
Thus
Answer:
Kinetic energy is the energy due to motion. Potential energy is energy stored in matter. The joule (J) is the SI unit of energy and equals (kg×m2s2) ( kg × m 2 s 2 ) .
please mark me brainliest and follow me my friend.
Maurice directs a beam of light on a sheet of glass at an angle of 51°. The refractive index of glass is <span>1.46. </span>The angle of refraction in the glass is 29 degrees. The answer is letter B.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
