The answer for your question is 0.27g/L
The wick and the wax
Sorry if that was useless, I'm not sure how generalized you were being
This problem is providing us with the molality of a solution of calcium iodide as 0.01 m. So the most likely van't Hoff factor is required and theoretically found to be 3 due to the following:
<h3>Van't Hoff factor:</h3>
In chemistry, the correct characterization of solutions also imply the identification of the ions it will release in aqueous solution. For that reason, the van't Hoff factor gives us an idea of this number, according to the formula the solute has got.
In such a way, for calcium iodide, we write its ionization equation as shown below:

Assuming it is able to ionize due to the low molality, because if it was higher, then it won't ionize. Hence, since we have three moles of ion products, one Ca²⁺ and two I⁻, we can conclude the van't Hoff factor would be 3, although calculations may lead to a different, yet close result.
Learn more about the van't Hoff factor: brainly.com/question/23764376
Answer:
ya same here i hope so btw
The independent variable would be the variable in the research that is being manipulated by the researcher. In this case, it would be temperature in the cage as it is what is being manipulated and changed in the research design. The dependent variable would be the variable that is being studied so, for this case, it would be the length and the weight of the mice. The constants are the factors that might affect the dependent variable but is held constant or the same by the researcher throughout the experiment. These are the size of the cage, amount of food and the exercise wheel. The flaw that the scientist would be studying the length of the mice since I don't think the temperature has any effect on it. And base from he results, the change in lengths are not conclusive.