Answer:
I think, (remember think) it might be 2.0 m/s
Explanation:
If it's wrong I'm truly sorry.
Answer:
i think the answer would be:Jonas’ brother gets out of the cab of the truck and sits in the back of the truck with the furniture. With less mass, they should be able to push the truck to the gas station.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>No, a rigid body cannot experience any acceleration when the resultant force acting on the body is zero.</em>
Explanation:
If the net force on a body is zero, then it means that all the forces acting on the body are balanced and cancel out one another. This sate of equilibrium can be static equilibrium (like that of a rigid body), or dynamic equilibrium (that of a car moving with constant velocity)
For a body under this type of equilibrium,
ΣF = 0 ...1
where ΣF is the resultant force (total effective force due to all the forces acting on the body)
For a body to accelerate, there must be a force acting on it. The acceleration of a body is proportional to the force applied, for a constant mass of the body. The relationship between the net force and mass is given as
ΣF = ma ...2
where m is the mass of the body
a is the acceleration of the body
Substituting equation 2 into equation 1, we have
0 = ma
therefore,
a = 0
this means that<em> if the resultant force acting on a rigid body is zero, then there won't be any force available to produce acceleration on the body.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
yes, should be
Explanation:
This is a hard yes or no question becuase the amplitudes are the same height but in different beating orders.
Answer:
The ratio of the orbital time periods of A and B is 
Solution:
As per the question:
The orbit of the two satellites is circular
Also,
Orbital speed of A is 2 times the orbital speed of B
(1)
Now, we know that the orbital speed of a satellite for circular orbits is given by:
where
R = Radius of the orbit
Now,
For satellite A:
Using eqn (1):
(2)
For satellite B:
(3)
Now, comparing eqn (2) and eqn (3):
