describe how you could use research and the scientific method to test a claim that organic foods are better than natural foods.
Use complete sentences, state your hypothesis and explain specifically how you would conduct the research and gather the data that you will use. You do not have to conduct the experiment, only explain what you would do and how you would analyze the results.
Natural food is not regulated - there is no rule or regulation. Food manufacturers can label any food as "natural".
Orgranic food is regulated by USFDA and must follow rules and regulations during material selection and processing. It must also passed inspections to maintain its "organic" label.
So the hypothesis is organic foods are better than natural foods. An experiment can be conducted to test this claim. Food ingredients are listed in all food labels. Visit the local supermarket and copy down the ingredients lists of both orgranic and natural foods.
Correlate the ingredients in two separate columns labeled organic and natural. Look them up to see if they are healthy; or man-made/processed. If there are more healthy ingredients in organic foods, the results support the claim.
Natural food is not directed - there is no run or control.<span> So the speculation is natural foods are superior to characteristic foods. An analysis can be led to test this claim. Food fixings are recorded in all food names. Visit the nearby general store and duplicate down the fixings arrangements of both organic and regular foods. </span>Hope this helps!
102 grams. Equation: Quantify of heat = mass x specific heat x difference in temperature We have: quantity of heat : 2300J specific heat: .449 J/g difference in t: 80 - 30 = 50 Solve for mass: 2300 = mass x 0.449 x 50 mass = 102.449 2 sig-figs --> 102 grams
