Answer:
(a) 5.056 x 10^-14 N
(b) 5.056 x 10^-14 N
Explanation:
X component of velocity of electron is 1.6 × 10^6 m/s
Y component of velocity of electron is 2.4 × 10^6 m/s
X component of magnetic field is 0.025 T
Y component of magnetic field is -0.16 T
charge on electron, q = - 1.6 x 10^-19 C
Write the velocity and magnetic field in the vector forms.


The force on the charge particle when it is moving in the magnetic field is given by

(a) Force on electron is given by


Magnitude of force is 5.056 x 10^-14 N.
(b) Force on a proton is given by


Magnitude of force is 5.056 x 10^-14 N.
Thus, the magnitude of force remains same but the direction of force is opposite to each other.
Explanation:
Answer:
kettles: holes left by glaciers.
cirques: three-sided valleys
erratics: large, out-of-place rocks bouldersleft by glaciers.
drumlins: egg-shaped hills
Explanation: APEX
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Given that an elevator moving down passes its neighbor, an elevator moving up. Their speed relative to one another is 8 m/s. What is the velocity of each elevator relative to someone standing on the first floor? Assume that the elevators are traveling at the same speed, and that the upward direction is
positive.
Solution
Given that upward direction is positive, then, the downward direction will be negative.
To get a relative velocity of 8m/s
4 - ( - 4 ) = 8
Therefore, the correct answer will be
One elevator is moving at 4 m/s; the other elevator is moving at -4 m/s
Which is option B
Because the negative multiply by negative sign will give positive sign.
Given
4 + 4 = 8.
ans: B
Kinetic energy = 
= 
= 50J
ps. the height will only affect its potential energy, not kinetic.
<span>During 1970s, same observations were seen as what we have observed today pertaining to our climate. Journals were discussing that there would be warming because of greenhouse gases emissions. Also, it was observed between the years 1970 to 1990 that there was a steady surface temperature increase. Due to this, people are now fixated with global warming rather than on global cooling.</span>