By the law of momentum conservation:-
=>m¹u¹ + m²u² = m1v1 + m²v² {let East is +ve}
=>u¹ + u² = v¹ + v² {as m1=m2}
=>3.5 - 2.75 = v1-1.5
<span>
=>v¹ = 2.25 m/s (East) </span>
A theorem can be proven (from axioms or prior theorems), using logic.
A hypothesis can be supported by evidence. The more evidence in support of the hypothesis, the more likely the hypothesis is to be correct. However, you’re always at the mercy of contrary evidence appearing in the future, to reduce the likelihood or even invalidate a hypothesis.
A (mathematical) proof suffers no such vulnerability to future evidence, as long as you hold the axioms of the theory to be true, and as long as there was no flaw in the construction of the proof.
Answer:
where is the graph I can't see it how can I solve the problem if I don't see the graph can you show the graph please
Answer:
a) d = 6.0 m
Explanation:
Since car is accelerating at uniform rate then here we can say that the distance moved by the car with uniform acceleration is given as
here we know that
now we will have
Answer:
D
Explanation:
<em>The correct answer would be in the axle of the wheels while you ride your bicycle.</em>
Options A, B, and C requires that the forces of friction is increased in order to have more control.
However, option D requires that there is a minimal frictional force in the axle of the wheels of a bicycle while riding so that a little effort would be required to keep the bicycle moving.
<u>The lesser the friction, the lower the effort that would be needed to keep the bicycle moving and vice versa.</u>
