All categories

3 years ago

Which law of motion accounts for the following statement?

Physics

2 answers:

Mnenie [13.5K]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer to the question is : The second law of Newton.

EXPLANATION:

As per the question, the ball is initially hit by a man.

The same ball is hit by a boy.

The ball moves faster for man than that of for the boy. It means the acceleration of ball in case of man is more as compared to the acceleration of the ball for the boy.

From Newton's second law, we know that force applied on a ball is equal to the product of mass with acceleration.

Mathematically force F = ma.

Here, m is the mass and a is the acceleration of the object.

Hence, more is the force, the more will be the acceleration.

As the ball is moving faster for man, he has applied more force on the ball.

Hence, the Newton's second law of motion accounts for the given statement.

julia-pushkina [17]3 years ago

5 0

That would be the second law

You might be interested in

A wave seen at the ocean’s shore is which kind of wave?

Lostsunrise [7]

B. Transverse Wave this is the correct answer

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two bodies of specific heats S1 and S2 having the same heat capacities are combined to form a single composite body. What is the

Dafna11 [192]

$\qquad\qquad\huge\underline{{\sf Answer}}♨$

Heat capacity of body 1 :

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:m_1s_1$

Heat capacity of body 2 :

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:m_2s_2$

it's given that, the the head capacities of both the objects are equal. I.e

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:m_1s_1 = m_2s_2$

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:m_1 = \dfrac{m_2s_2}{s_1}$

Now, consider specific heat of composite body be s'

According to given relation :

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:(m_1 + m_2) s' = m_1s_1 + m_2s_2$

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:s' = \dfrac{ m_1s_1 + m_2s_2}{m_1 + m_2}$

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:s' = \dfrac{ m_2s_2+ m_2s_2}{ \frac{m_2s_2}{s_1} + m_2 }$

[ since, $m_2s_2 = m_1s_1$ ]

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:s' = \dfrac{ 2m_2s_2}{ m_2(\frac{s_2}{s_1} + 1)}$

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:s' = \dfrac{ 2 \cancel{m_2}s_2}{ \cancel{m_2}(\frac{s_2}{s_1} + 1)}$

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \:s' = \dfrac{ 2 s_2}{ (\frac{s_2 + s_1}{s_1} )}$

$\qquad \sf \dashrightarrow \: s' = \dfrac{2s_1s_2}{s_1 + s_2}$

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Should nuclear energy be part of sustainable energy future? explain your answer

liraira [26]

Answer:

Nuclear power is presently a sustainable energy source, but could become completely renewable if the source of uranium changed from mined ore to seawater. Since U extracted is continuously replenished through geologic processes, nuclear would become as endless as solar.

4 0

3 years ago

Which is an example of kinetic energy? A. a stretched rubber band B. wind C. water in a reservoir D. natural gas E. an object su

daser333 [38]

Kinetic energy is energy of motion.

In the cases of a stretched rubber band, water in a reservoir, natural gas, or an object suspended above the ground, everything is just laying there, and nothing is moving. There's nothing there that has kinetic energy.

If there's any wind, then air is moving. The moving air has kinetic energy.

6 0

3 years ago

R S ( M ) = 2 G M c 2 , where G is the gravitational constant and c is the speed of light. It is okay if you do not follow the d

padilas [110]

The provided question's answer is "Schwarzschild radius".

The conversion factor between mass and energy is the speed of light squared.

GM/r stands for gravitational potential energy, also known as energy per unit mass.

GM/rc² then has "mass per unit mass" units. In other words, as mass/mass splits out in a dimensional analysis, "dimensionless per unit."

The derivation yields a formula for time or space coordinate ratios requiring sqrt(1 - 2GM/rc²). This number becomes 0 when r=2GM/c2, or the formula becomes infinite if in the denominator. However, there is no justification for using c² as a conversion factor there. Consider the initial expression sqrt(1 - 2GM/rc²).

Assume that m is used as the test particle's mass instead of 1. Then you have sqrt(m - 2GMm/rc² and mass units. This expression denotes that the rest energy of the test mass m you introduced into the gravitational field is "gone" at that radius.

The 2 would be absent if the gravitational field were Newtonian. However, at the event horizon, Einstein gravity is slightly stronger than Newton gravity, resulting in the factor 2 in qualitative terms.

So, the given equation is of Schwarzschild radius.

Learn more about Schwarzschild radius here:

brainly.com/question/12647190

#SPJ10

3 0

2 years ago