1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arte-miy333 [17]
3 years ago
14

Joe and Bill throw identical balls vertically upward. Joe throws his ball with an initial speed twice as high as Bill. If there

is no air resistance, the maximum height of Joe's ball will be?
Physics
1 answer:
exis [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the maximum height of Joe's ball will be 4 times Bill's ball.

Explanation:

let bill's velocity be v then Joe's velocity is 2v.

and initial velocities of both bill and Joe are 0

for Bill

v^2-u^2= 2gh

h=\frac{v^2}{2gh}

for Joe

(2v)^2-u^2= 2gh'

h'=\frac{4v^2}{2g}

thus we can write that

h'=4h

the maximum height of Joe's ball will be 4 times Bill's ball.

You might be interested in
Why is pseudoscience bad?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It is quite difficult to picture a pseudoscientist—really picture him or her over the course of a day, a year, or a whole career. What kind or research does he or she actually do, what differentiates him or her from a carpenter, or a historian, or a working scientist? In short, what do such people think they are up to?

… it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

The answer might surprise you. When they find time after the obligation of supporting themselves, they read papers in specific areas, propose theories, gather data, write articles, and, maybe, publish them. What they imagine they are doing is, in a word, “science”. They might be wrong about that—many of us hold incorrect judgments about the true nature of our activities—but surely it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

What is pseudoscience?

“Pseudoscience” is a bad category for analysis. It exists entirely as a negative attribution that scientists and non‐scientists hurl at others but never apply to themselves. Not only do they apply the term exclusively as a discrediting slur, they do so inconsistently. Over the past two‐and‐a‐quarter centuries since the term popped into the Western European languages, a great number of disparate doctrines have been categorized as sharing a core quality—pseudoscientificity, if you will—when in fact they do not. It is based on this diversity that I refer to such beliefs and theories as “fringe” rather than as “pseudo”: Their defining characteristic is the distance from the center of the mainstream scientific consensus in whichever direction, not some essential property they share.

Scholars have by and large tended to ignore fringe science as regrettable sideshows to the main narrative of the history of science, but there is a good deal to be learned by applying the same tools of analysis that have been used to understand mainstream science. This is not, I stress, to imply that there is no difference between hollow‐Earth theories and geophysics; on the contrary, the differences are the point of the analysis. Focusing on the historical and conceptual relationship between the fringe and the core of the various sciences as that blurry border has fluctuated over the centuries provides powerful analytical leverage for understanding where contemporary anti‐science movements come from and how mainstream scientists might address them.

As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be

The central claim of this essay is that the concept of “pseudoscience” was called into being as the shadow of professional science. Before science became a profession—with formalized training, credentialing, publishing venues, careers—the category of pseudoscience did not exist. As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be. In fact, despite many decades of strenuous effort by philosophers and historians, a precise definition of “science” remains elusive. It should be noted however that the absence of such definitional clarity has not seriously inhibited the ability of scientists to deepen our understanding of nature tremendously.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Thalia is drafting a plan to move a large, perfect sphere concrete sculpture that is in front of her office building. Describe t
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:She would need to first know the weight of the sculpture and what she is going to move it with then she will need to use newton's second law to calculate the amount of force needed to move it

Explanation: I just did the assignment on edgunity

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 2.0 kg block is pulled across a horizontal surface by a 15 N force at a constant velocity. What is the force of friction actin
lianna [129]

Answer:

<em>The force of friction acting on the block has a magnitude of 15 N and acts opposite to the applied force.</em>

Explanation:

<u>Net Force </u>

The Second Newton's law states that an object acquires acceleration when an unbalanced net force is applied to it.

The acceleration is proportional to the net force and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.

If the object has zero net force, it won't get accelerated and its velocity will remain constant.

The m=2 kg block is being pulled across a horizontal surface by a force of F=15 N and we are told the block moves at a constant velocity. This means the acceleration is zero and therefore the net force is also zero.

Since there is an external force applied to the box, it must have been balanced by the force of friction, thus the force of friction has the same magnitude acting opposite to the applied force.

The force of friction acting on the block has a magnitude of 15 N opposite to the applied force.

6 0
3 years ago
The main equation we are using to measure the e/m ratio is:
kow [346]

Answer:

a.

Explanation:

the electrons beams deflection radius will be halved.

6 0
3 years ago
What term is used to describe how well liquids flow
iris [78.8K]
Well water or any  liquid  actually takes the form of the cup of bowl or whatever you put the liquid in
REMEMBER- Liquid has no shape.
hope this helps!!!!!!!!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • which equations represent the relationship between wavelength and frequency for a sound wave? check all that apply
    14·1 answer
  • A 200-g block is attached to a horizontal spring and executes simple harmonic motion with a period of 0.250 s. The total energy
    13·1 answer
  • A cube of an unknown element has a shiny, silvery color. The side of the cube measures 2.0 cm and the cube has a mass of 14.56 g
    8·1 answer
  • Calculate the average speed (in m/s) of a car that travels 50km in 30 minutes.
    15·1 answer
  • Can you help me??????????????????????????)?
    7·1 answer
  • A construction worker puts 20J of energy in to one strike of his hammer on the head of a nail. The energy transferred to driving
    15·2 answers
  • Assume an axon has an internal diameter of 1μm and a myelin sheath 1μm thick. The internal specific resistance is 100 Ω cm. For
    14·1 answer
  • If you shine a light of frequency 375hz on a double slit setup , and you measure the slit separation to be 950 nm and the screen
    15·1 answer
  • Please show the work and steps. The answer is (3.3 s, 15 m/s)
    7·1 answer
  • Decelerating cor, driver having taken his foot off the accelerator and applying <br>brakes​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!