Where are the questions so that I can deliver a more accurate answer.
Answer:
<em>A farmer with a field of solar panels.</em>
Explanation:
The closest to a locally sources energy would have been
A coal mine located in their county.
But coal as an energy source is not environmentally friendly due to carbon emission, and should not be what the group should advocate for.
<em>The best bet for them is </em>
<em>A farmer with a field of solar panels.</em>
As solar panels are a source of green energy and green energy is what the environmental group should often and always advocate for
Answer:
A) incandescent ligth bulb, its efficiency is about 10%
Explanation:
The incandescent bulb, that is, the well-known focus with its warm light, was one of the most useful inventions of the 19th century although its use is currently considered very inefficient. These lamps waste between 80 and 90 percent of the total electricity they consume by turning it into heat. The metal filament thus heated and which is the central part of the bulb, only converts the remaining energy into light. Its service life ranges from 750 to 1,000 hours.
This is why they are used in ovens for food preparation, because of the large amount of heat they generate.
The steam boiler in a power plant depends on the fuel that it is using, but a coal-fired power plant with modern technology its efficiency is about 40%
Electric motor are around 85-92%
In order to better understand the concept of efficiency it is as if we pay 100 dollars of gasoline for our weekly use, but of that 100 dollars the car only uses 10 dollars to do that activity the rest of the money the 90 dollars were lost because of the inefficiencies of the vehicle.
Answer:
The answer is 24 (for the first question).
Explanation:
<h2><u><em>
PLEASE MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!!!</em></u></h2>
The reasoning is wrong if we look into Newton's Law of gravitation.
Newton's law of gravitation states that every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.
The law is written as follows;
The distance between the two particles, is a function of force and their masses not necessarily time of motion.
In the given problem only time of motion was considered which is wrong.
Thus, the reasoning is wrong if we look into Newton's Law of gravitation.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19680441
