Answer: 37.5 kg in 3 s.f.
Explanation:
It would be the <span>Energy Therapies Reiki that is a common type of work wherein it makes use of touch and visualisation. In addition, this kind of therapy has its primary goal just to lessen stress and furthermore promotes relaxation. The technique is said to be making use of a "life force energy."</span>
Answer: Waning
Explanation: Not much explanation for this
Answer:
a) the required time is 0.6283 μs
b) the inductor current is 0.5 mA
Explanation:
Given the data in the question;
The capacitor voltage has its maximum value of 25 V at t = 0
i.e V
= V₀ = 25 V
we determine the angular velocity;
ω = 1 / √( LC )
ω = 1 / √( ( 20 × 10⁻³ H ) × ( 8.0 × 10⁻¹² F) )
ω = 1 / √( 1.6 × 10⁻¹³ )
ω = 1 / 0.0000004
ω = 2.5 × 10⁶ s⁻¹
a) How much time does it take until the capacitor is fully discharged for the first time?
V = V₀sin( ωt )
we substitute
25V = 25V × sin( 2.5 × 10⁶ s⁻¹ × t )
25V = 25V × sin( 2.5 × 10⁶ s⁻¹ × t )
divide both sides by 25 V
sin( 2.5 × 10⁶ × t ) = 1
( 2.5 × 10⁶ × t ) = π/2
t = 1.570796 / (2.5 × 10⁶)
t = 0.6283 × 10⁻⁶ s
t = 0.6283 μs
Therefore, the required time is 0.6283 μs
b) What is the inductor current at that time?
(t) = V₀√(C/L) sin(ωt)
{ sin(ωt) = 1 )
(t) = V₀√(C/L)
we substitute
(t) = 25V × √( ( 8.0 × 10⁻¹² F ) / ( 20 × 10⁻³ H ) )
(t) = 25 × 0.00002
(t) = 0.0005 A
(t) = 0.5 mA
Therefore, the inductor current is 0.5 mA
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
