Answer:
The second object takes 2.28 s to fall the 25.5 m.
Explanation:
In this case, both objects take the same time to fall, since <em>no vertical velocity is added </em>to any of them.
You can also confirm this by sepparating the second's object movement into its two directions: in the horizontal one, we have <em>linear uniform motion, </em>and in the vertical one, we have <em>free fall, </em>with exactly the same characteristics as for the first object.
s alluded to in the other answers, salt refers to any ionic compound that doesn't have “oxides” in it. Table salt is sodium chloride. Going down the periodic table, the first column contains lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, and francium. This group (alkali metals) of atoms (and their corresponding positive ions) gets larger in the order shown above. Therefore, their ionic bonds with chloride (or any nonmetal) gets smaller. The trend of their corresponding compounds is a decreasing hardness, decreasing melting point, decreasing boiling point, and decreasing thermal stability. These are the major periodic trends of these corresponding compounds. Other metal ions generally have higher positive charges on them. This makes the ionic bonds considerably larger and you can probably surmise most of their corresponding properties listed above. However, the details of their lattice structures may cause the overall trend to vary.
The direction of motion of the charge
Answer:
They have same density
Explanation:
The density of an object is defined as
where
m is the mass of the object
V is its volume
Let's call 
and 
the mass and the volume of ball C, respectively. Therefore, the density of ball C is:
We know that the volume of ball C is 3 times the volume of ball D, so
And we also know that ball D has 1/3 the mass of ball C:
So, the density of ball D is:
Therefore, the two balls have same density.
Answer:
The magnetic field is lowest for largest distance and highest when distance is least.
Explanation:
The magnitude of magnetic field strength at a distance 'r' from a long straight wire carrying current 'I' is given as:
Now, as per question, the distance 'r' is varied while keeping the current constant in the wire.
As seen from the above formula, the magnitude of magnetic field strength for a constant current varies inversely with the distance 'r'. This means that, as the value of 'r' increases, the magnitude of magnetic field strength decreases and vice-versa.
Therefore, the magnitude of magnetic field strength is maximum when the distance 'r' is least and the magnetic field is minimum for the largest distance.
Example:
If 
are the magnitudes of magnetic field strengths for distances 
respectively such that 
. Now, as per the explanation above, the order of magnitudes of magnetic field strength is:
