2 years ago

Select the correct answer.

Physics

1 answer:

tester [92]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

30%

Explanation:

Total profit=$25000

Initial investment=$10000

Return on investment is given by

RoI=(Gain from investment-cost of investment)/cost of investment

$RoI=\frac {25000-10000}{10000}\times 100=150%$

RoI=150% but since it's over 5 years, we distribute for 5 years hence annual $RoI=\frac {150}{5}=30%$

Therefore, RoI=30%

You might be interested in

When point charges q = +8.4 uC and q2 = +5.6 uC are brought near each other, each experiences a repulsive force of magnitude 0.6

Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

it is separated by 80 cm distance

Explanation:

As per Coulombs law we know that force between two point charges is given by

$F = \frac{kq_1q_2}{r^2}$

here we know that

$q_1 = +8.4\mu C$

$q_2 = +5.6 \mu C$

force between two charges is given as

$F = 0.66 N$

now we have

$F = \frac{kq_1q_2}{r^2}$

$0.66 = \frac{(9\times 10^9)(8.4 \mu C)(5.6 \mu C)}{r^2}$

$r = 0.8 m$

so it is separated by 80 cm distance

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

John is traveling north at 20 meters/second and his friend Betty is traveling south at 20 meters/second. If north is the positiv

Tpy6a [65]

I think it's just 20/20

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What particle is NOT located in the nucleus? A.proton B.electron C.neutron D.quark

baherus [9]

I think it is electron. Electrons are located outside of the nucleus

5 0

2 years ago

Which will most likely result in the revision of a theory?

viva [34]

I would say A not 100℅ thou

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you think the inner planets should be explored or should the money be spent on other things? Justify your opinion.

frosja888 [35]

Answer:

yes i think that inner planets should be explored because if we ever find new life or are able to live there then i think its worth takeing a risk.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago