1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nimfa-mama [501]
3 years ago
8

Water flows on the inside of a steel pipe with an ID of 2.5 cm. The wall thickness is 2 mm, and the convection coefficient on th

e inside is 500 W/m2 · ◦C. The convection coefficient on the outside is 12 W/m2 · ◦C. Calculate the overall heat-transfer coefficient. What is the main determining factor for U
Physics
1 answer:
Hatshy [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

U = 11.67 W/m² °C

Explanation:

Inner diameter, d = 2.5 cm = 0.025 m

Thickness of the wall, t = 2 mm = 0.002 m

thus, the outer diameter, D = d + 2t = 0.025 + 2 x 0.002 = 0.029 m

h_i =500 W/m^2.^oC

h_0 =12 W/m^2.^oC

Now, based on outside convection heat transfer

we have

\frac{1}{UA_o}=\frac{1}{h_iA_i}+\frac{1}{h_oA_o}

on rearranging, we get

\frac{1}{U}=\frac{1}{h_i}\frac{A_o}{A_i}+\frac{1}{h_o}

where, A_i\ \textup{and}\ A_o are the perimeter respective to inner and and outer diameter

on substituting the values, we get

\frac{1}{U}=\frac{1}{500}\frac{0.029^2}{0.025}+\frac{1}{12}

or

U = 11.67 W/m² °C

You might be interested in
A convex mirror, like the passenger-side rearview mirror on a car, has a focal length of -3.0 m . An object is 6.0 m from the mi
Artist 52 [7]

A) -2.0 m

Look at the ray diagram attached in the picture, where:

p identifies the location of the object

q identifies the location of the image

F identifies the focus of the mirror

Each tick represents 1 m

We have

p = 6.0 m is the distance of the object from the mirror

f = -3.0 m is the focal length

From the ray diagram, we see that q has a distance of 2.0 m from the mirror, and it's on the other side of the mirror compared to the object, so

q = -2.0 m

This can also be verified by using the mirror equation:

\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{-3.0 m}-\frac{1}{6.0 m}=-\frac{3}{6.0 cm}\\q = \frac{-6.0 cm}{3}=-2.0 cm

B) Upright and virtual

As we see from the picture, the image is upright, since it has same orientation as the object.

Also, we notice that the image is on the other side of the mirror, compared to the object. For a mirror,

- An image is said to be real if it is on the same side of the object

- An image is said to be virtual if it is on the opposite side of the mirror

Therefore, this means that the image is virtual.

8 0
2 years ago
This is a two part question: What is the force of friction acting on a 100 kg steel slab at rest on a steel floor?
Crazy boy [7]
1) 0N... friction opposes the motion of an object, since the block is at rest there is no motion thus no friction

2) F=ma
= (5.5kg)(30m/s)
=165 N
7 0
2 years ago
What do you mean by pressure​
noname [10]
Pressure is the force applied perpendicular to the surface of an object per unit area over which that force is distributed.
P=F/A
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
is dimensionally correct relation necessarily to be a correct physical relation? explain with example.​
Andreas93 [3]

Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤

Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.

No, not necessarily.

For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is  F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.

But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:

F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r  

It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for  G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.

It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.

A simpler counter example is  1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.

4 0
3 years ago
Everything is perished.........(is it,isn't it, aren't they, are they​
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

everything is perished isn't it?

hope it helps.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How are chargeable cells different from ordinary dry cells​
    13·1 answer
  • A material that water is not able to move through?
    5·2 answers
  • Linh builds a circuit from the diagram shown. Which bulb could Linh remove from the circuit to make all of the other bulbs stop
    9·2 answers
  • A 5.0-kilogram sphere, starting from rest, falls freely 22 meters in 3.0 seconds near the surface of a planet. Compared to the a
    5·1 answer
  • What is the definition of Physics?​
    13·2 answers
  • A uniform sphere (I = 2/5 MR 2 ) rolls down an incline. (a) What must be the incline angle if the linear acceleration of the cen
    14·2 answers
  • Which class of lever do spoon and scissors belong to?​
    5·2 answers
  • Look at the image and answer the question correctly.
    14·2 answers
  • Galaxy B moves away from galaxy A at 0.577 times the speed of light. Galaxy C moves away from galaxy B in the same direction at
    9·1 answer
  • X=(150^2•sin(2•42))/9.8
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!