False. That description fits the wave's 'frequency'.
It has nothing to do with refraction.
Answer:
The length of rod A will be <u>greater than </u>the length of rod B
Explanation:
We, know that the formula for final length in linear thermal expansion of a rod is:
L' = L(1 + ∝ΔT)
where,
L' = Final Length
L = Initial Length
∝ = Co-efficient of linear expansion
ΔT = Change in temperature
Since, the rods here have same original length and the temperature difference is same as well. Therefore, the final length will only depend upon the coefficient of linear expansion.
For Rod A:
∝₁ = 12 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹
For Rod B:
∝₂ = β₂/3
where,
β₂ = Coefficient of volumetric expansion for rod B = 24 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹
Therefore,
∝₂ = 24 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹/3
∝₂ = 8 x 10⁻⁶ °C⁻¹
Since,
∝₁ > ∝₂
Therefore,
L₁ > L₂
So, the length of rod A will be <u>greater than </u>the length of rod B
Complete Question
An infinite sheet carries a uniform, positive charge per unit area. The electric field produced by the sheet is represented by parallel lines drawn with a density N lines per m2 that are perpendicular to and away from the sheet. The charge per unit area on the sheet is doubled. How should the density of the electric field lines be changed?
A It should stay the same
B It should be quadrupled.
C It should be quintupled
D It should be doubled.
E It should be tripled
Answer:
Option D is the correct option
Explanation:
Generally electric field is mathematically represented as

Where
is the charge per unit area (Charge density )
From the question we are told that
is doubled hence the
Looking the equation above we see that the value of the electric field will also double given that it is directly proportional to the charge density
That would be 110/22, which is 5 hours