Answer:
Impossible.
Explanation:
The ideal Coefficient of Performance is:


The real Coefficient of Performance is:


Which leads to an absurds, since the real Coefficient of Performance must be equal to or lesser than ideal Coefficient of Performance. Then, the cycle is impossible, since it violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Answer:
The graph representing the linear inequalities is attached below.
Explanation:
The inequalities given are :
y>x-2 and y<x+1
For tables for values of x and y and get coordinates to plot for both equation.
In the first equation;
y>x-2
y=x-2
y-x = -2
The table will be :
x y
-2 -4
-1 -3
0 -2
1 -1
2 0
The coordinates to plot are : (-2,-4) , (-1,-3), (0,-2), (1,-1) ,(2,0)
Use a dotted line and shade the part right hand side of the line.
Do the same for the second inequality equation and plot then shade the part satisfying the inequality.
The graph attached shows results.
Answer:
The result in terms of the local Reynolds number ⇒ Re = [μ_∞ · x] / v
Explanation:
See below my full workings so you can compare the results with those obtained from the exact solution.
Answer:
Option A, World War II
Explanation:
During the period of industrial revolution around 1915-25, the chemical engineering has taken a new shape. During this period (i.e around the world war I), there was rise in demand for liquid fuels, synthetic fertilizer, and other chemical products. This lead to development of chemistry centre in Germany . There was rise in use of synthetics fibres and polymers. World war II saw the growth of catalytic cracking, fluidized beds, synthetic rubber, pharmaceuticals production, oil & oil products, etc. and because of rising chemical demand, chemical engineering took a new shape during this period
Hence, option A is the right answer
A collection of electrons lol