Complete Question:
A chemist prepares a solution of silver (I) perchlorate (AgCIO4) by measuring out 134.g of silver (I) perchlorate into a 50.ml volumetric flask and filling the flask to the mark with water. Calculate the concentration in mol/L of the silver (I) perchlorate solution. Round your answer to 2 significant digits.
Answer:
13 mol/L
Explanation:
The concentration in mol/L is the molarity of the solution and indicates how much moles have in 1 L of it. So, the molarity (M) is the number of moles (n) divided by the volume (V) in L:
M = n/V
The number of moles is the mass (m) divided by the molar mass (MM). The molar mass of silver(I) perchlorate is 207.319 g/mol, so:
n = 134/207.319
n = 0.646 mol
So, for a volume of 50 mL (0.05 L), the concentration is:
M = 0.646/0.05
M = 12.92 mol/L
Rounded to 2 significant digits, M = 13 mol/L
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
By definition, the equilibrium constanct, Kc, for the reaction A ⇒ 2B is
= [A]^1 / [B]^2
Substitute [A] = 4 and [B] = 2 in the equation,
[A]^1 / [B]^2
= 4^1 / 2^2
= 1
= Kc
So yes the reaction is at equilibrium.
Answer:
El número atómico de cada uno de los átomos es 26
Explanation:
El número de masa es la suma de las masas del protón y el neutrón de un átomo.
El número atómico es el número de protones en el átomo.
Los parámetros dados son;
La suma del número másico de ambos átomos = 110
La suma de los neutrones = 58
Por lo tanto, sea el número de protones y neutrones en un isótopo = P₁ y N₁ y el número de protones y neutrones en el otro isótopo = P₂ y N₂
Tenemos;
P₁ + N₁ + P₂ + N₂ = 110
N₁ + N₂ = 58
Por lo tanto;
P₁ + P₂ = 110 - (N₁ + N₂)
P₁ + P₂ = 110 - 58 = 52
Dado que los isótopos son del mismo elemento, sus protones serán iguales, por lo tanto;
P₁ = P₂
P₁ + P₂ = P₁ + P₁ = 2 × P₁
P₁ + P₂ = 52
2 × P₁ = 52
P₁ = 52/2 = 26 = P₂
El número atómico de ambos átomos es el número de protones en el átomo que es 26.
El número atómico del elemento del átomo es 26
Answer:
is a well-sustantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.such fact- supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real worlds.
That is false.... I hope this is true or false
