1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slega [8]
3 years ago
11

What does the stonefish eat

Chemistry
1 answer:
solmaris [256]3 years ago
5 0
Croat or stones stones
You might be interested in
What are some differences between insect larvae and worms?
tangare [24]
Worms are fully developed insects and larvae are not.
6 0
3 years ago
For 30 points pls help me with these 2 questions I will mark brainiest btw
vazorg [7]

IS THIS A REAL QUESTION!?!?!?!?!

8 0
3 years ago
In the coffee-cup calorimeter you used in the laboratory, which of the following statements is true? A.The water is part of the
Goryan [66]
The "A)The water is part of the system" statement is true in the coffee-cup calorimeter used in the laboratory. The calorimeter is the device used for measuring the amount of the heat flow of a chemical reaction. The coffee-cup calorimeter is one of the most common types of calorimeter which has the water as a part of its system<span>.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
The main characteristic of the first stage of photosynthesis is
weeeeeb [17]
"is the the production of hydrogen and energy. The process of photosynthesis happens in two stages thelight-dependent reactions and the Calvin cycle (light-independent reactions)"
6 0
3 years ago
The early alchemists used to do an experiment in which water was boiled for several days in a sealed glass container. Eventually
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Hello,

Since the sealed glass container is isolated (closed system) no escape of boiled water (steam) was presented, so it is obvious that the alchemists were wrong, it is impossible that the water turns into "earth" because it has components that water does not have by itself (metallic and nonmetallic ions and molecular compounds) that is why the solid residue could have come from suspended solids or simply solids that were initially dissolved and due to the boiling of water, they remained at the bottom of the flask. Nevertheless, the experiment done by Lavoisier was more precise because the conclusion based on the initial and final masses, accounts for the boiling process; besides, the mass agreement substantiates that no mass was removed due to the isolation of the flask.

Best regards.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mg(s) + 2HCl(aq) mc019-1.jpg H2(g) + MgCl2(aq)
    7·1 answer
  • When 26.62 miles of FeS2 reacts with 5.44 miles of O2 how many miles of SO2 are formed
    14·1 answer
  • What is being oxidized?
    8·1 answer
  • If in the following diagram the substance is in solid form during stage 1, what is happening during stage 3?
    6·2 answers
  • Is wood complex or simple matter
    11·1 answer
  • Need the following questions answered please and thank you
    14·1 answer
  • Stuck can’t find answer for a or b
    9·2 answers
  • How long would it take for a sound impulse to travel through an aluminum rod 1,500 meters long?
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    7·1 answer
  • Cite 2 reasons Democritus’ ideas about the atom were NOT accepted
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!