1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikdorinn [45]
3 years ago
5

Katie has read 32% of a book. if she has read 80 pages, how many more pages does Katie have left to read?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Blababa [14]3 years ago
5 0
Katie has read 32%, so 32%=80 pages. To get the total number of pages, you have to divide 32 and 80 by 8 to get 4% and 10 pages. 4% of the book is 10 pages, and in order to get 100%, you have to multiply by 25(4*25=100) on both sides. Remember, what you do to one side, you do to the other side. That leaves you with 100% and 250 pages. The book is 250 pages long. If she  has read 80 pages, you subtract 80 from 250 to find how many pages she has left to read. The difference is 170. Katie has 170 pages left to read.
You might be interested in
What is i^2 simplified?
iren [92.7K]

i²=-1


It"s a basic result of complex number :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Which choice is equivalent to the quotient shown here when x > 0
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

this is equal to √(3x²/12) = √(x²/4) = x/2

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Simplify the algebraic expression -5(6x)
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

-30x

Step-by-step explanation:

The parenthesis is just to multiply, and you can combine like terms. So -5*6=-30, which you multiply with x to get -30x.

5 0
3 years ago
Please answer question image below.
anastassius [24]
Yes it has a constant rate of change which is 3/2
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Can -2y = -6 be written in slope-intercept form? If so, what is it?
    8·2 answers
  • The area of the above polygon
    8·1 answer
  • 8th grade math need help ASAP giving brainleast
    8·1 answer
  • If the sun of a number is tripled, the result is nine less than twice the number. Find the number
    10·1 answer
  • What is 3 divided by 108. Show your work
    5·1 answer
  • How is experimental probability different from theoretical probability?
    15·1 answer
  • Graph the linear equation. Find three points that solve the equation, then plot on the graph.
    8·2 answers
  • Kelsey's preschool tuition is $180 per week. She receives a small discount for the honor roll, $50 per month. Her grandparents h
    7·2 answers
  • 6<br> Express in exponential form.<br> I will mark you brainliest
    12·1 answer
  • Help pls so fake answers or report need answer now
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!