For both cases we will use the proportional values of the distance referring to the amplitude and intensity. Theoretically we know that the intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, while the amplitude is inversely proportional to the distance, therefore,
PART A ) Intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance
Therefore the intensity of the two values would be
PART B) Amplitude is inversely proportional to the distance
The people who do the plucking and start it
<h2>
Answer: Marie Curie's notebooks</h2>
Explanation:
Marie Curie's notebooks, as well as all of her belongings, including her clothes, were contaminated with ionizing radiation. In fact, also those of her husband, because <u>this couple of scientists discovered the radioactivity of several elements</u>, helping the advance of science, but did not know about the consequences of dealing with these materials without adequate protection.
It should be noted that Curie's notes are stored in the basements of the National Library of France, stored in thick lead boxes and those who wish to access these documents must follow the appropriate protocol to treat radioactive material, wear appropriate clothing and sign a responsibility agreement before allowing them to review the documents.
lol I'm not sure if you were meant to add an image or if this is a joke but 1+1 is 2 ig
Answer:
A. The period of an oscillation does not depend upon amplitude.
Explanation:
The period of a spring-mass system is:
T = 1/f = 2π√(m/k)
where f is the frequency, m is the mass, and k is the spring constant.
The answer isn't B. There are no frictionless systems in the real world.
The answer isn't C or D. As shown, the frequency is a function of both the mass and the spring constant.
The answer isn't E. Turning motion into heat is not an advantage for a clock.
The correct answer is A. The period of the system does not depend on the amplitude.
