All categories

3 years ago

What type of change is needed to break down a compound

Physics

1 answer:

Ivan3 years ago

7 0

the change needed to break down a compound is chemical change

You might be interested in

A satellite is launched to orbit the Earth at an altitude of 2.90 x10^7 m for use in the Global Positioning System (GPS). Take t

marin [14]

Answer:

$T=66262.4s$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Altitude $A=2.90 *10^7$

Mass $m=5.97 * 10^{24} kg$

Radius $r=6.38 *10^6 m.$

Generally the equation for Satellite Speed is mathematically given by

$V=(\frac{GM}{d} )^{0.5}$

$V=(\frac{6.67*10^{-11}*5.97 * 10^{24}}{6.38 *10^6+2.90 *10^7} )^{0.5}$

$V=3354.83m/s$

Therefore

Period T is Given as

$T=\frac{2 \pi *a}{V}$

$T=\frac{2 \pi *(6.38 *10^6+2.90 *10^7}{3354.83}$

$T=66262.4s$

4 0

3 years ago

What is a model drawing of 2HCI?

klasskru [66]

This is the answer just double it

7 0

3 years ago

An infinite line of charge with linear density λ1 = 8.2 μC/m is positioned along the axis of a thick insulating shell of inner r

bixtya [17]

1) Linear charge density of the shell: $-2.6\mu C/m$

2) x-component of the electric field at r = 8.7 cm: $1.16\cdot 10^6 N/C$ outward

3) y-component of the electric field at r =8.7 cm: 0

4) x-component of the electric field at r = 1.15 cm: $1.28\cdot 10^7 N/C$ outward

5) y-component of the electric field at r = 1.15 cm: 0

Explanation:

The linear charge density of the cylindrical insulating shell can be found by using

$\lambda_2 = \rho A$

where

$\rho = -567\mu C/m^3$ is charge volumetric density

A is the area of the cylindrical shell, which can be written as

$A=\pi(b^2-a^2)$

where

$b=4.7 cm=0.047 m$ is the outer radius

$a=2.7 cm=0.027 m$ is the inner radius

Therefore, we have :

$\lambda_2=\rho \pi (b^2-a^2)=(-567)\pi(0.047^2-0.027^2)=-2.6\mu C/m$

Here we want to find the x-component of the electric field at a point at a distance of 8.7 cm from the central axis.

The electric field outside the shell is the superposition of the fields produced by the line of charge and the field produced by the shell:

$E=E_1+E_2$

where:

$E_1=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi r \epsilon_0}$

where

$\lambda_1=8.2\mu C/m = 8.2\cdot 10^{-6} C/m$ is the linear charge density of the wire

r = 8.7 cm = 0.087 m is the distance from the axis

And this field points radially outward, since the charge is positive .

And

$E_2=\frac{\lambda_2}{2\pi r \epsilon_0}$

where

$\lambda_2=-2.6\mu C/m = -2.6\cdot 10^{-6} C/m$

And this field points radially inward, because the charge is negative.

Therefore, the net field is

$E=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi \epsilon_0 r}+\frac{\lambda_2}{2\pi \epsilon_0r}=\frac{1}{2\pi \epsilon_0 r}(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2)=\frac{1}{2\pi (8.85\cdot 10^{-12})(0.087)}(8.2\cdot 10^{-6}-2.6\cdot 10^{-6})=1.16\cdot 10^6 N/C$

in the outward direction.

To find the net electric field along the y-direction, we have to sum the y-component of the electric field of the wire and of the shell.

However, we notice that since the wire is infinite, for the element of electric field $dE_y$ produced by a certain amount of charge $dq$ along the wire there exist always another piece of charge $dq$ on the opposite side of the wire that produce an element of electric field $-dE_y$ , equal and opposite to $dE_y$ .

Therefore, this means that the net field produced by the wire along the y-direction is zero at any point.

We can apply the same argument to the cylindrical shell (which is also infinite), and therefore we find that also the field generated by the cylindrical shell has no component along the y-direction. Therefore,

$E_y=0$

Here we want to find the x-component of the electric field at a point at

r = 1.15 cm

from the central axis.

We notice that in this case, the cylindrical shell does not contribute to the electric field at r = 1.15 cm, because the inner radius of the shell is at 2.7 cm from the axis.

Therefore, the electric field at r = 1.15 cm is only given by the electric field produced by the infinite wire:

$E=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi \epsilon_0 r}$

where:

$\lambda_1=8.2\mu C/m = 8.2\cdot 10^{-6} C/m$ is the linear charge density of the wire

r = 1.15 cm = 0.0115 m is the distance from the axis

This field points radially outward, since the charge is positive . Therefore,

$E=\frac{8.2\cdot 10^{-6}}{2\pi (8.85\cdot 10^{-12})(0.0115)}=1.28\cdot 10^7 N/C$

For this last part we can use the same argument used in part 4): since the wire is infinite, for the element of electric field $dE_y$ produced by a certain amount of charge $dq$ along the wire there exist always another piece of charge $dq$ on the opposite side of the wire that produce an element of electric field $-dE_y$ , equal and opposite to $dE_y$ .

Therefore, the y-component of the electric field is zero.

Learn more about electric field:

brainly.com/question/8960054

brainly.com/question/4273177

#LearnwithBrainly

4 0

3 years ago

Each wheel of a 320 kg motorcycle is 52 cm in diameter and has rotational inertia 2.1 kg m2 . The cycle and its 75 kg rider are

Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

The value is $h = 32.91 \ m$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

The diameter of each wheel is $d = 52 \ cm = 0.52 \ m$

The mass of the motorcycle is $m = 320 \ kg$

The rotational kinetic inertia is $I = 2.1 \ kg \ m^2$

The mass of the rider is $m_r = 75 \ kg$

The velocity is $v = 85 \ km/hr = 23.61 \ m/s$

Generally the radius of the wheel is mathematically represented as

$r = \frac{d}{2}$

=> $r = \frac{0.52}{2}$

=> $r = 0.26 \ m$

Generally from the law of energy conservation

Potential energy attained by system(motorcycle and rider ) = Kinetic energy of the system + rotational kinetic energy of both wheels of the motorcycle

=> $Mgh = \frac{1}{2} Mv^2 + \frac{1}{2} Iw^2 + \frac{1}{2} Iw^2$

=> $Mgh = \frac{1}{2} * Mv^2 + Iw^2$

Here $w$ is the angular velocity which is mathematically represented as

$w = \frac{v }{r }$

$Mgh = \frac{1}{2} * Mv^2 + I \frac{v}{r} ^2$

Here $M = m_r + m$

$M = 320 + 75$

$M = 395 \ kg$

$395 * 9.8 * h = 0.5 * 395 * (23.61)^2 + 2.1 *[\frac{ 23.61}{ 0.26} ] ^2$

=> $h = 32.91 \ m$

7 0

4 years ago

A police officer in hot pursuit of a criminal drives her car through an unbanked circular (horizontal) turn of radius 300 m at a

Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

The angle (relative to vertical) of the net force of the car seat on the officer to the nearest degree is <u>10°.</u>

Explanation:

Given:

Mass of the driver is, $m=55\ kg$

Radius of circular turn is, $R=300\ m$

Linear speed of the car is, $v=22.2\ m/s$

Since, the car makes a circular turn, the driver experiences a centripetal force radially inward towards the center of the circular turn. Also, the driver experiences a downward force due to her weight. Therefore, two forces act on the driver which are at right angles to each other.

The forces are:

1. Weight = $mg=55\times 9.8=539\ N$

2. Centripetal force, 'F', which is given as:

$F=\frac{mv^2}{R}\\F=\frac{55\times (22.2)^2}{300}\\\\F=\frac{55\times 492.84}{300}\\\\F=\frac{27106.2}{300}=90.354\ N$

Now, the angle of the net force acting on the driver with respect to the vertical is given by the tan ratio of the centripetal force (Horizontal force) and the weight (Vertical force) and is shown in the triangle below. Thus,

$\tan \theta=\frac{90.354}{539}\\\tan \theta=0.1676\\\theta=\tan^{-1}(0.1676)=9.52\approx 10$ °

Therefore, the angle (relative to vertical) of the net force of the car seat on the officer to the nearest degree is 10°.

3 0

3 years ago