1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tomtit [17]
3 years ago
11

Which set of these comparisons is INCORRECT? (More stable means it has a more negative energy.) a) The 1s orbital in H is more s

table than the 1s orbital in He+ b) The 2s orbital in He atom is less stable than the 2s orbital in He+ c) The 2s subshell in Li is more stable than the 2p subshell in Li
Chemistry
1 answer:
timama [110]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a.

Explanation:

By the Linus Pauling's diagram, we know that the order of the energy of the subshell at the same atom, from the less to the higher, is:

1s < 2s < 2p < 3s < 3p < 4s < 4d ...

As larger is the atom, the attraction energy between the electron and the nuclei is weak. The size of the atom increase from right to left in the periods, and from the top to the bottom in the families. The cations are smaller than the neutral atoms (the attraction is more effective with fewer electrons), and the anions are larger than the neutral atoms. So, in order of size, and also the energy of the similar subshells:

He⁺ < He < H

How higher the energy, less negative it is, so less stable is the orbital.

a. As shown above, the energy of the orbital at H is higher than the energy at the orbital at He⁺, so the 1s orbital is more stable at He⁺, and the sentence is incorrect.

b. As shown above, the energy of the orbital at He is higher than the energy of the orbital He⁺, so the 2s orbital at He is less stable than the 2s orbital at He⁺, and the sentence is correct.

c. From the Linus Pauling's diagram, the energy of 2p is higher than the energy of the 2s, so the 2s subshell is more stable, and the sentence is correct.

You might be interested in
At a cost of $1600/oz, how much would you have to pay for a solid cubic foot of gold?
Alex777 [14]
<h3>You will pay $ 30876800</h3>

We'll begin by calculating the mass in ounce (oz) of a cube foot (ft³) of gold. This can be obtained as follow:

<h3 />

Density of gold = 19298 oz/ft³

Volume of gold = 1 ft³

<h3>Mass of gold =?</h3>

Density = mass /volume

19298 = mass / 1

<h3>Mass of gold = 19298 oz</h3>

Finally, we shall determine the cost of 19298 oz of gold. This can be obtained as follow:

1 oz = $ 1600

Therefore,

19298 oz = 19298 × 1600

19298 oz = $ 30876800

Therefore, a solid cube foot of gold (i.e 19298 oz) will cost $ 30876800

Learn more: brainly.com/question/15407624

4 0
3 years ago
Determine whether the disruption of the bonds or attractions occurs during protein hydrolysis or protein denaturation.
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

The disruption of the bonds or attractions occurs during protein hydrolysis which results in the loss for the primacy structure. The peptide bonds is the bond affected in this scenario.

The disruption of the bonds however only exist in the process of denaturation and this results in a change in the confirmation which could be secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structural related. And example of the bonds affected include salt bridges, disulfide bridges, hydrogen bonds etc.

5 0
3 years ago
Can I have a gamergirl
Tom [10]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which isomer of 1-bromo-4-tert-butylcyclohexane reacts faster when refluxed with potassium tert-butoxide?
grigory [225]

Answer:

See explanation.

Explanation:

Since potassium tert-butoxide is a strong bulky base, we expect that an elimination reaction predominates.

This reaction is expected to occur by E2 mechanism. The cis isomer of  1-bromo-4-tert-butylcyclohexane is known to react faster by E2 mechanism because it fulfills the anticoplanar arrangement required for for E2 mechanism, where the leaving group and adjacent proton must be anti to each other and in the same plane. The trans isomer can not fulfill this requirement.

7 0
3 years ago
Salts usually have a low melting point true or false
antoniya [11.8K]
Hello!

This is false!! It is the other way around. They usually have a very high melting point. For example table salt is around 800deg C which is approx just under 1500deg F.

Hope this helps. Thank you
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • James is looking at a parallel circuit plan for lighting. There is a battery providing the power. There are switches labeled A,B
    8·2 answers
  • Chromosomes are<br> ??????
    14·1 answer
  • Carbon tetrachloride, once widely used in fire extinguishers andas a dry cleaning fluid, has been found to cause liver damage to
    15·1 answer
  • 1) The PPF: Draw a Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) for the production of two goods, machine tools (a capital good) and d
    13·1 answer
  • An acid is:
    10·2 answers
  • Rank the following quantities from smallest to largest: 5,200, dozen, pair,gross,ream.
    13·1 answer
  • How can you change a objects state of matter
    5·1 answer
  • What is the concentration of lithium ions in 0.400 M Li₂HPO₄?
    7·1 answer
  • Escoge uno de los derechos de la siguiente lista que están Escogidos en el código de la niñez y adolescencia escribe en una hoja
    12·1 answer
  • Look at the picture ​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!