<span>The economy is based upon the production of oil. Saudi Arabi is one of the leading oil producing countries in the world. It is one of the founding counties of Opec, an oil cartel made up of middle eastern oil producing countries which try to manipulate the worldwide price of oil.</span>
I actually believe for the first question, it would be complete destructive interference as the amplitude and the approximate wavelength for each are the same and will completely or entirely cancel out, rather than simply decreasing or lowering the amplitude as in the bottom question.
The amplitude for the first will be 0, as the 2 waves will cancel each other out. The amplitude of the second, will be 3x, I believe, assuming the amplitude of the first is 2x and the second is 1x, in a constructive interference, I believe the amplitudes would add up.
Likewise for the bottom, I believe you would be subtracting the supposed amplitude of the first which is 2x from 1x which would be 1x.
Answer:
1. the graph is showing the speed of the object at different times.
Explanation:
2. the object is slowing down
Answer: a) 7.71 m/s², b) - 6.67 m/s²
Explanation: first thing to note is that
1 mile = 1609.34
1 hour = 3600s
Hence, 100mph to m/s = (100 × 1609.34)/3600 = 44.71 m/s
Initial velocity (u) = 0, final velocity (v) = 44.71 m/s, t = 5.8s, a = acceleration =?
By using newton's laws of motion
v = u + at
44.71 = 0 + a(5.8)
44.71 = 5.8a
a = 44.71/5.8
a = 7.71 m/s²
Question b)
The car is completing a stop which implies that the car is coming to rest, and when a car is coming to rest, the final velocity (v) is zero.
Hence u = 34 m/s, v = 0, a =?, t = 5.1 s
v = u + at
0 = 34 + a(5.1)
a(5.1) = - 34
a = - 34/5.1
a = - 6.67 m/s².
The negative sign beside the acceleration shows that the body is decelerating
