The answer yr looking for would b true!
<span>The answer is 6 kg the mass of the second
object. By using Inversely proportional formula it means that (14 kg) (3 m/s</span>²<span>)
= M (7 m/s</span>²<span>). Where M is the mass of the second object. For the
Newton’s second law of motion formula which is: Force = mass x acceleration, we
have:</span>
<span>F = (14 kg) (3 m/s</span>²<span>) = 42 N</span>
Therefore:
<span>42 N = M (7 m/s</span>²)
<span>M = (42 N) / (7 m/s</span>²<span>)</span>
M = 6 kg mass of the second object
Answer:
70713
Explanation:
Because you need to multiply the amount of water lost (2430) by the time (29.1) which will equal 70713J/g needed to counter the loss.
Hope this helps:)
Hey there!
Here is your answer:
<u><em>The proper answer to this question is "Earth, and Mercury".</em></u>
Reason:
<u><em>Mercury</em></u><span><u><em> has a density of 5.427 g/cm³</em></u>
<u><em>&</em></u>
</span><span><u><em>Earth has a density of 5.515 g/cm^3</em></u></span><u><em /></u>
<em>Therefore the dense planet is Earth.</em>
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!
~Nonportrit
No. Science is all about facts and experiments. Making stuff up would go against that, and wouldn't be science.
