Answer:
No, it is not conserved
Explanation:
Let's calculate the total kinetic energy before the collision and compare it with the total kinetic energy after the collision.
The total kinetic energy before the collision is:
where m1 = m2 = 1 kg are the masses of the two carts, v1=2 m/s is the speed of the first cart, and where v2=0 is the speed of the second cart, which is zero because it is stationary.
After the collision, the two carts stick together with same speed v=1 m/s; their total kinetic energy is
So, we see that the kinetic energy was not conserved, because the initial kinetic energy was 2 J while the final kinetic energy is 1 J. This means that this is an inelastic collision, in which only the total momentum is conserved. This loss of kinetic energy does not violate the law of conservation of energy: in fact, the energy lost has simply been converted into another form of energy, such as heat, during the collision.
Answer:
<h3>The answer is 2.15 m/s²</h3>
Explanation:
The acceleration of an object given it's mass and the force acting on it can be found by using the formula
where
f is the force
m is the mass
From the question we have
We have the final answer as
<h3>2.15 m/s²</h3>
Hope this helps you
when object goes under acceleration
c).its velocity always increases
<h3><u>Additional</u><u> </u><u>information</u><u>:</u><u>-</u></h3>
★ Acceleration: Rate of increase in velocity.
★ Velocity: Distance travelled by a body per unit time in given direction is called velocity .
Answer:
2.28
Explanation:
From mirror formula,
1/f = 1/u+1/v .......... Equation 1
Where f = focal length of the mirror, v = image distance, u = object distance.
Note: The focal length mirror is positive.
make v the subject of the equation,
v = fu/(u-f)............ Equation 2
Given: f = 2.5 cm, u = 1.4 cm
Substitute into equation 2
v = 2.5(1.4)/(1.4-2.5)
v = 3.5/-1.1
v = -3.2 cm.
Note: v is negative because it is a virtual image.
But,
Magnification = image distance/object distance
M = v/u
Where M = magnification.
Given: v = 3.2 cm, u = 1.4 cm
M = 3.2/1.4
M = 2.28.
Thus the magnification of the tooth = 2.28.
A "screen" or even just a set of parallel bars are highly reflective to electromagnetic waves as long as the open spaces are small compared to the wavelengths.
"Grid" dishes work fine ... with less weight and less wind resistance ... for frequencies below about 3 GHz. (Wavelengths of at least 10 cm.)
(I even worked on a microwave system in South America where huge grid dishes were used on a 90-mile link.)
