Lo experiences tidal heating primarily because lo’s elliptical orbit causes the tidal force on lo to vary as it orbits the Jupiter. Thus, lo’s elliptical orbit is essential to its tidal heating. This elliptical orbit, in turn, is an end result of the orbital resonance among lo, Europa and ganymade. This orbital resonance origin lo to have a more elliptical orbit than it would because lo intermittently passes Europa and ganymade in the same orbital position. We cannot perceive tidal forces of tidal heating in lo but rather we foresee that they must occur based on the orbital characteristic of the moons and active volcanoes on lo is the observational evidence that tidal heating is significant in lo.
1.) The object's Velocity
Faster it goes, more kinetic energy it has
Answer:
A). A few of the positive particles aimed at a gold foil seemed to bounce back off of the thin metallic foil.
Explanation:
Scientists decided to change the model of the atom when they discovered new evidence that showed 'few of the positive particles aimed at a gold foil seemed to bounce back off of the thin metallic foil.' On this ground, <u>Rutherford concluded that atom is mostly made up of empty space and thus, he proposed a nucleus model of atom in which the atom comprises of the tiny and positively charged nucleus is surrounded by electrons with a negative charge</u>. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
a) a = 4.9 m / s², N = 16.97 N and b) F = 9.8 N
Explanation:
a) For this exercise we will use Newton's second law, we write a reference system with the x axis parallel to the plane, see attached, in this system the only force we have to break down is weight, let's use trigonometry
sin 30 = Wx / W
cos 30 = Wy / W
Wx = W sin30
Wy = W cos 30
Let's write the equations on each axis
X axis
Wx = ma
Y Axis
N- Wy = 0
N = Wy = mg cos 30
N = 2.0 9.8 cos 30
N = 16.97 N
We calculate the acceleration
a = Wx / m
a = mg sin 30 / m
a = g sin 30
a =9.8 sin 30
a = 4.9 m / s²
b) For the block to move with constant speed, the acceleration must be zero, so the force applied must be equal to the weight component
F -Wx = 0
F = Wx
F = m g sin 30
F = 2.0 9.8 sin 30
F = 9.8 N
Answer:
The ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem we must first start by doing a drawing that will represent the situation. (See picture attached).
We can see in the picture that the least the angle the farther the ball will go. So we need to find the A and B position to determine how farther the second shot would go. Let's start with point A.
So, first we need to determine the components of the velocity of the ball, like this:






we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.317s for the ball to hit on point A.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point A with this time. We can find it like this:



Once we found the distance between the net and point A, we can similarly find the distance between the net and point B:







t= -0.9159s or t=0.468s
we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.468s for the ball to hit on point B.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point B with this time. We can find it like this:



So once we got the two distances we can now find the difference between them:

so the ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.