Why can't we implement the center tapped full wave rectifier without center-tapped transformer

To develop muscle tone, a woman lifts a 2.50 kg weight held in her hand. She uses her biceps muscle to flex the lower arm throug

Romashka [77]

To solve this problem we will use the concepts related to Torque as a function of the Force in proportion to the radius to which it is applied. In turn, we will use the concepts of energy expressed as Work, and which is described as the Torque's rate of change in proportion to angular displacement:

$\tau = Fr$

Where,

F = Force

r = Radius

Replacing we have that,

$\tau = Fr$

$\tau = 21cm (\frac{1m}{100cm})* 550N$

$\tau = 11.55Nm$

The moment of inertia is given by 2.5kg of the weight in hand by the distance squared to the joint of the body of 24 cm, therefore

$I = 0.25Kg\cdot m^2 +(2.5kg)(0.24m)^2$

$I = 0.394kg\cdot m^2$

Finally, angular acceleration is a result of the expression of torque by inertia, therefore

$\tau = I\alpha \rightarrow \alpha = \frac{\tau}{I}$

$\alpha = \frac{11.55}{0.394}$

$\alpha = 29.3 rad/s^2$

PART B)

The work done is equivalent to the torque applied by the distance traveled by 60 °° in radians $(\pi / 3)$ , therefore

$W = \tau \theta$

$W = 11.5* \frac{\pi}{3}$

$W = 12.09J$

4 0

2 years ago

The diagram below shows different weights on the see-saw. Will the see-saw move?

oee [108]

Answer:

yes it will

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

2

timama [110]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to its net force.

$a = \frac{f}{m}$

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The front 1.20 m of a 1,600-kg car is designed as a "crumple zone" that collapses to absorb the shock of a collision. (a) If a c

eimsori [14]

To develop the problem it is necessary to apply the kinematic equations for the description of the position, speed and acceleration.

In turn, we will resort to the application of Newton's second law.

PART A) For the first part we look for the time, in a constant acceleration, knowing the speeds and the displacement therefore we know that,

$X_f = X_i +\frac{1}{2}(V_i+V_f)t$

Where,

X = Desplazamiento

V = Velocity

t = Time

In this case there is no initial displacement or initial velocity, therefore

$X_f = \frac{1}{2} (V_i+V_f)t$

Clearing for time,

$t = \frac{2X_f}{(V_i+V_f)}$

$t = \frac{2*1.2}{24+0}$

$t = 0.1s$

PART B) This is a question about the impulse of bodies, where we turn to Newton's second law, because:

F = ma

Where,

m=mass

a = acceleration

Acceleration can also be written as,

$a= \frac{\Delta V}{t}$

Then

$F = m\frac{\Delta V}{t}$

$F = m\frac{V_f-V_i}{t}$

$F = m\frac{-V_i}{t}$

$F = \frac{(1600kg)(-24m/s)}{(0.1s)}$

$F = -384000N$

Negative symbol is because the force is opposite of the direction of moton.

PART C) Acceleration through kinematics equation is defined as

$V_f^2=V_i^2-2ax$

$0 = (24m/s)^2-2*a(1.2m)$

$a = \frac{(24m/s)^2}{1.2m}$

$a=480m/s^2$

The gravity is equal to 0.8, then the acceleration is

$a = 480*\frac{g}{9.8}$

$a = 53.3g$

3 0

2 years ago

Two horizontal rods are each held up by vertical strings tied to their ends. Rod 1 has length L and mass M; rod 2 has length 2L

antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

Rod 1 has greater initial angular acceleration; The initial angular acceleration for rod 1 is greater than for rod 2.

Explanation:

For the rod 1 the angular acceleration is

$\tau_1 = I_1\alpha _1 \\\\\alpha_1 = \dfrac{\tau_1}{I_1}$

Similarly, for rod 2

$\alpha_2 = \dfrac{\tau_2}{I_2}.$

Now, the moment of inertia for rod 1 is

$I_1 = \dfrac{1}{3}ML^2$ ,

and the torque acting on it is (about the center of mass)

$\tau_1 = Mg\dfrac{L}{2};$

therefore, the angular acceleration of rod 1 is

$\alpha_1 = \dfrac{Mg\dfrac{L}{2}}{\dfrac{1}{3}ML^2},$

$\boxed{\alpha_1 = \dfrac{3g}{2L} }$

Now, for rod 2 the moment of inertia is

$I_2 = \dfrac{1}{3}(2M)(2L)^2$

$I_2 = \dfrac{8}{3} ML^2,$

and the torque acting is (about the center of mass)

$\tau _2 = (2M)g \dfrac{(2L)}{2}$

$\tau _2 = 2MgL;$

therefore, the angular acceleration $\alpha_2$ is

$\alpha_2 = \dfrac{2MgL;}{\dfrac{8}{3} ML^2,}.$

$\boxed{\alpha_2 = \dfrac{3g}{4L}}$

We see here that

$\dfrac{3g}{2L} > \dfrac{3g}{4L}$

therefore

$\boxed{\alpha_1 > \alpha_2.}$

In other words , the initial angular acceleration for rod 1 is greater than for rod 2.

7 0

2 years ago