Answer:
<h2><em>Heyy</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>Here</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em>.</em><em>.</em></h2>
<h2><em><u>Satt is the German word for full and it most likely comes from the same Latin word that saturated.</u></em></h2>
<h2><em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>!</em><em>!</em></h2>
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, it is possible to comprehend these mass-particles problems by means of the concept of mole, molar mass and the Avogadro's number because one mole of any substance has 6.022x10²³ particles and have a mass equal to the molar mass.
In such a way, for C₆H₁₂O₆, whose molar mass is about 180.16 g/mol, the referred mass would be:
Best regards!
Answer:
oxidation number is correct!! :)
Explanation:
Kepler did not study the speed of the planets, rather, he studied how the planets move in the solar system. He proposed three laws. As a summary, he described that the planets move around the sun in the shape of an ellipse (orbit), and the Sun being one of the foci. Then, he proposed the period for the planet to complete one revolution around the Sun.
On the other hand, Newton studied the forces acting on the planet (or any object in space) that explain how the planets move around the solar system as described by Kepler. Also, Kepler's observations only apply to planets and not the moons or satellites. Thus, Kepler only made laws from observations, while Newton based it from underlying principles that led him to mathematical equations such as the law of universal gravitation.
