The heat absorbed to raise temperature : Q = 31350 J
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
Given
m = mass = 150 g
Δt = Temperature difference : 50 °C
Required
Heat absorbed
Solution
Heat can be formulated
<em>
Q = m.c.Δt
</em>
The specific heat of water = c = 4.18 J/g °C
Input the value :
Q = 150 x 4.18 x 50
Q = 31350 J
You did not provide the statements but a possible answer might be that the current atomic theory is sound and that technology that could challenge it does not exist at this time. There is no way to change it because no research can be done about it.
Answer:
(a) 
(b) 
(c) 
(d) 
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, given the solubility of each salt, we can compute their molar solubilities by using the molar masses. Afterwards, by using the mole ratio between ions, we can compute the concentration of each dissolved and therefore the solubility product:
(a) 
In such a way, as barium and selenate ions are in 1:1 molar ratio, they have the same concentration, for which the solubility product turns out:
![Ksp=[Ba^{2+}][SeO_4^{2-}]=(6.7x10^{-4}\frac{mol}{L} )^2\\\\Ksp=4.50x10^{-7}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ksp%3D%5BBa%5E%7B2%2B%7D%5D%5BSeO_4%5E%7B2-%7D%5D%3D%286.7x10%5E%7B-4%7D%5Cfrac%7Bmol%7D%7BL%7D%20%20%20%29%5E2%5C%5C%5C%5CKsp%3D4.50x10%5E%7B-7%7D)
(B) 
In such a way, as barium and bromate ions are in 1:2 molar ratio, bromate ions have twice the concentration of barium ions, for which the solubility product turns out:
![Ksp=[Ba^{2+}][BrO_3^-]^2=(7.30x10^{-3}\frac{mol}{L})(3.65x10^{-3}\frac{mol}{L})^2\\\\Ksp=1.55x10^{-6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ksp%3D%5BBa%5E%7B2%2B%7D%5D%5BBrO_3%5E-%5D%5E2%3D%287.30x10%5E%7B-3%7D%5Cfrac%7Bmol%7D%7BL%7D%29%283.65x10%5E%7B-3%7D%5Cfrac%7Bmol%7D%7BL%7D%29%5E2%5C%5C%5C%5CKsp%3D1.55x10%5E%7B-6%7D)
(C) 
In such a way, as ammonium, magnesium and arsenate ions are in 1:1:1 molar ratio, they have the same concentrations, for which the solubility product turns out:
![Ksp=[NH_4^+][Mg^{2+}][AsO_4^{3-}]^2=(1.31x10^{-4}\frac{mol}{L})^3\\\\Ksp=2.27x10^{-12}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ksp%3D%5BNH_4%5E%2B%5D%5BMg%5E%7B2%2B%7D%5D%5BAsO_4%5E%7B3-%7D%5D%5E2%3D%281.31x10%5E%7B-4%7D%5Cfrac%7Bmol%7D%7BL%7D%29%5E3%5C%5C%5C%5CKsp%3D2.27x10%5E%7B-12%7D)
(D) 
In such a way, as the involved ions are in 2:3 molar ratio, La ion is twice the molar solubility and MoOs ion is three times it, for which the solubility product turns out:
![Ksp=[La^{3+}]^2[MoOs^{-2}]^3=(2*1.58x10^{-5}\frac{mol}{L})^2(3*1.58x10^{-5}\frac{mol}{L})^3\\\\Ksp=1.05x10^{-22}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ksp%3D%5BLa%5E%7B3%2B%7D%5D%5E2%5BMoOs%5E%7B-2%7D%5D%5E3%3D%282%2A1.58x10%5E%7B-5%7D%5Cfrac%7Bmol%7D%7BL%7D%29%5E2%283%2A1.58x10%5E%7B-5%7D%5Cfrac%7Bmol%7D%7BL%7D%29%5E3%5C%5C%5C%5CKsp%3D1.05x10%5E%7B-22%7D)
Best regards.
Element and compound , and or heterogeneous and homogeneous
Answer:
Yes, a precipitate of PbS forms
Explanation:
The equation of the reaction is given as:
Pb(NO₃)₂ + Na₂S → PbS + 2NaNO₃
The lead sulfide forms a precipitate in the aqeous solution.
Precipitation is a form of reaction in which ions combines to form a solid precipiate. Most double displacement reactions in which ionic compounds are the reactants results in formation of a precipitate as the product.
There are rules of solubility which guides a reaction that would lead to the formation of a precipitate. The mos applicable of the rules to the reaction stated above is that "carbonates, phosphates, sulfides, oxides and hydroxides are insolube". The sulfide of lead formed in the product is therefore insoluble.
