<span>I believe an oxidation reaction is occurring</span>
Answer:
Scientists seek to eliminate all forms of bias from their research. However, all scientists also make assumptions of a non-empirical nature about topics such as causality, determinism and reductionism when conducting research. Here, we argue that since these 'philosophical biases' cannot be avoided, they need to be debated critically by scientists and philosophers of science.
Explanation:
Scientists are keen to avoid bias of any kind because they threaten scientific ideals such as objectivity, transparency and rationality. The scientific community has made substantial efforts to detect, explicate and critically examine different types of biases (Sackett, 1979; Ioannidis, 2005; Ioannidis, 2018; Macleod et al., 2015). One example of this is the catalogue of all the biases that affect medical evidence compiled by the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University (catalogueofbias.org). Such awareness is commonly seen as a crucial step towards making science objective, transparent and free from bias.
Answer:
Q = 143,921 J = 143.9 kJ.
Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, according to the given information, it turns out possible for us to calculate the absorbed heat by considering this is a process involving sensible heat associated to the vaporization of water, which is isothermic and isobaric; and thus, the heat of vaporization of water, with a value of about 2259.36 J/g, is used as shown below:
Thus, we plug in the mass and the aforementioned heat of vaporization of water to obtain the following:
Regards!
The sign's glass absorbed 25466.7 J
<h3>
Further explanation</h3>
Given
The temperature of glass : 23.5 °C to 65.5 °C
mass = 905 g
the specific heat capacity = 0.67 J/g °C
Required
Heat absorbed
Solution
Heat absorbed by sign's glass can be formulated :
ΔT=65.5 - 23.5 = 42
Radio waves.
microwaves.
infrared waves.
light.
ultraviolet waves (rays)
x-rays.
gamma rays.
