moles NaOH = c · V = 0.2432 mmol/mL · 24.75 mL = 6.0192 mmol
moles H2SO4 = 6.0192 mmol NaOH · 1 mmol H2SO4 / 2 mmol NaOH = 3.0096 mmol
Hence
[H2SO4]= n/V = 3.0096 mmol / 38.94 mL = 0.07729 M
The answer to this question is [H2SO4] = 0.07729 M
Answer:
Option B. 2096.1 K
Explanation:
Data obtained from the question include the following:
Enthalpy (H) = +1287 kJmol¯¹ = +1287000 Jmol¯¹
Entropy (S) = +614 JK¯¹mol¯¹
Temperature (T) =.?
Entropy is related to enthalphy and temperature by the following equation:
Change in entropy (ΔS) = change in enthalphy (ΔH) / Temperature (T)
ΔS = ΔH / T
With the above formula, we can obtain the temperature at which the reaction will be feasible as follow:
ΔS = ΔH / T
614 = 1287000/ T
Cross multiply
614 x T = 1287000
Divide both side by 614
T = 1287000/614
T = 2096.1 K
Therefore, the temperature at which the reaction will be feasible is 2096.1 K
Answer:
Rb = +1 , Sr = +2, In= +3, Sn = +4, Sb= +5
Explanation:
Formula:
Zeff = Z - S
Z = atomic number
S = number of core shell or inner shell electrons
For Sn:
Electronic configuration:
Sn₅₀ = [Kr] 4d¹⁰ 5s² 5p²
Zeff = Z - S
Zeff = 50 - 46
Zeff = +4
For Rb:
Electronic configuration:
Rb₃₇ = [Kr] 5s¹
Zeff = Z - S
Zeff = 37 - 36
Zeff = +1
For Sb:
Electronic configuration:
Sb₅₁ = [Kr] 4d¹⁰ 5s² 5p³
Zeff = Z - S
Zeff = 51 - 46
Zeff = +5
For In:
Electronic configuration:
In₄₉ = [Kr] 4d¹⁰ 5s² 5p¹
Zeff = Z - S
Zeff = 49 - 46
Zeff = +3
For Sr:
Electronic configuration:
Sr₃₈= [Kr] 5s²
Zeff = Z - S
Zeff = 38 - 36
Zeff = +2
Answer:
Final temperature = 
Explanation:
Given that,
Heat added, Q = 250 J
Mass, m = 30 g
Initial temperature, T₁ = 22°C
The Specific heat of Cu= 0.387 J/g °C
We know that, heat added due to the change in temperature is given by :

Put all the values,

So, the final temperature is equal to
.
Answer:
Dipole-dipole interactions
Step-by-step explanation:
Each molecule consists of <em>two different elements</em>.
Thus, each molecule has permanent <em>bond dipoles</em>.
The dipoles do not cancel, so the attractive forces are dipole-dipole attractions.
"Covalent bonds" is <em>wrong,</em> because there are no bonds between the two molecules.
There are dipole-induced dipole and London dispersion forces, but they are much weaker than the dipole-dipole attractions.