Answer:
the terminal velocity of 14 nested coffee filters is 3.2 m/s
Explanation:
Given the data in the question;
we know that;
The terminal velocity is proportional to the square root of weight.
v ∝ √W
v = k√W
the proportionality constant depends upon the surface area and the density of the medium (like air). The coffee filters can be stacked such that the resulting area is roughly unchanged. So, the constant of proportionality k is also unchanged
v/√W = constant
v₂/√W₂ = v₁/√W₁
v₂ = v₁√(W₂ / W₁ )
given that;
v₁ = 0.856 m/s,
W₂ = 14W₁; meaning 14 coffee filters have 14 times the weight of a single coffee filter
so we substitute
v₂ = 0.856 √(14W₁ / W₁ )
v₂ = 0.856 √( 14( W₁/W₁)
v₂ = 0.856 √( 14(1)
v₂ = 0.856 √( 14 )
v₂ = 0.856 × 3.741657
v₂ = 3.2 m/s
Therefore, the terminal velocity of 14 nested coffee filters is 3.2 m/s
V = d ÷ t --> bc d=vt
V = (76+54)÷(2+5) = 130÷7 = 18.57km/hr
Complete Question
The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
Explanation:
From he question we are told that
The first mass is
The second mass is
From the question we can see that at equilibrium the moment about the point where the string holding the bar (where are hanged ) is attached is zero
Therefore we can say that
Making x the subject of the formula
Looking at the diagram we can see that the tension T on the string holding the bar where are hanged is as a result of the masses ()
Also at equilibrium the moment about the point where the string holding the bar (where () and are hanged ) is attached is zero
So basically
Making subject
When both particles, the electron and the proton move at the same speed, they may have differences with their de Broglie wavelength, the particle that would have a longer wavelength would be the proton since the wavelength is in direct proportionality with the mass of the particle.
Answer:
No, because she is hoping that people will vote for her.
Explanation:
Altruism is when you do something for others and have very little expectation of getting something in return. In this case, Janetta expected something in return from her friends. We may not also be sure of the sincerity of Janetta appreciating friendship. From the above definition of altruism, we conclude that Janetta's actions are not altruistic because she hoped that people will vote for her.