whats that supposed to mean
The AMOUNT of energy the ball has doesn't change. It's 294 joules in Darwin's hand, and it's still 294 joules when the ball hits the ground. It's all PE before he let's it go, and it steadily changes from PE to KE all the way down.
It BEGINS to turn into KE immediately, when Darwin lets go of the ball, and it starts to fall.
More and more PE turns into KE as the ball falls, all the way down.
When the ball hits the ground, it has no more PE left. All of its mechanical energy is then KE.
Answer:
<h2>18150 J</h2>
Explanation:
The kinetic energy of the car can be found by using the formula
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ceb/a6cebc16564db2f4a971fdaa11d42f08f9eb5166" alt="k = \frac{1}{2} m {v}^{2} \\"
m is the Mass
v is the velocity
From the question we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1253/d12539eda144e282133c8d709fa5c7c7982c6140" alt="k = \frac{1}{2} \times 1200 \times {5.5}^{2} \\ = 600 \times 30.25"
We have the final answer as
<h3>18150 J</h3>
Hope this helps you
In physics, "work<span>" is when a force applied to an object moves the object in the same direction as the force. If someone pushes against a wall, no </span>work<span> is done on the system. It is calculated as follows:
Work = Force x distance
Work = 25 N x 4 meters
Work = 100 N.m</span>
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.