Answer:
The answer already exists in your question...
That is correct expansion
Expand the expression as
(<em>s</em> + 1)³/<em>s</em> ⁵ = (<em>s</em> ³ + 3<em>s</em> ² + 3<em>s</em> + 1)/<em>s</em> ⁵
… = 1/<em>s</em> ² + 3/<em>s</em> ³ + 3/<em>s</em> ⁴ + 1/<em>s</em> ⁵
Then taking the inverse transform, you get
LT⁻¹ [1/<em>s</em> ² + 3/<em>s</em> ³ + 3/<em>s</em> ⁴ + 1/<em>s</em> ⁵]
… = LT⁻¹ [1/<em>s</em> ²] + LT⁻¹ [3/<em>s</em> ³] + LT⁻¹ [3/<em>s</em> ⁴] + LT⁻¹ [1/<em>s</em> ⁵]
… = LT⁻¹ [1!/<em>s</em> ²] + 3/2 LT⁻¹ [2!/<em>s</em> ³] + 1/2 LT⁻¹ [3!/<em>s</em> ⁴] + 1/24 LT⁻¹ [4!/<em>s</em> ⁵]
… = <em>t</em> + 3/2 <em>t</em> ² + 1/2 <em>t</em> ³ + 1/24 <em>t</em> ⁴
A milllion probably like 1 million
Answer:
line b
Step-by-step explanation:
y = -2x+2 has a slope of -2 (means it's going downhill) and a y-intercept of 2. Line b is the only line that matches this description.
