People use data tables and graphs in many financial careers and when looking at the statistics for something as simple as what they saw on the news, etc. When scientists use them, they’re both using them to see the numbers and the facts. They’re both able to use graphs and data tables to help them. They are different though because scientists use them for science related things like how much a tree grew in a year while everyday people use them to see the average amount of drop outs per year or something along those lines.
Data tables and graphs are very vital to a scientists job. They help them easily collect and organize information to where anyone can read it. It may not be absolutely necessary, but it’s something every scientist uses.
Any scientist doing any sort of research would use them. Whether they’re a biologist, geologist or whatever, they all use graphs and data tables to help them organize their research.
your answer is c. your welcome
brainliest?
Your mass can never change no matter where you are since mass is the amount of matter you contain. By going to the moon, you do become lighter due to the weaker gravity but the amount of matter that you are made of (your mass) does not change.
I hope the helps. Let me know if anything is unclear.
Explanation:
divide the weight in grams by the atomic mass from the periodic table, then multiply the result by Avogadro's number..
Hope this works!!
Structures of <span>
1-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene and </span>
2-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene are shown below.
It can be seen that <span>
1-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene is containing a C-H bond in which carbon is sp</span>² hybridized (i.e. =C-H) while such bonding is absent in
2-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene.
So, as we know that the peak of C-H stretching of alkenes is found in the region of 3010-3100 cm⁻¹ with medium intensity. Therefore,
1-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene will show this peak and
2-bromo-3-methyl-2-butene will lack this peak in IR spectrum.