1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena-2011 [213]
3 years ago
11

You’ve probably heard police officers on television repeat the same line every single time they arrest someone: “You have the ri

ght to remain silent.” Have you ever wondered why they always say this? As it turns out, all police officers in the country are required by law to say these words, which are called “Miranda Rights.” They are named after a famous court case from 1966, Miranda v. Arizona.
THE CASE
In 1966, an Arizona man named Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and assaulting a teenage girl. After a few hours of questioning, he confessed his guilt to a police officer. Later, during his trial, the prosecution
used his confession as evidence to convict him. When the court did find him guilty, his lawyers appealed the case.

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court. The case related to the Constitution, because the 5th Amendment to the Constitution gives everyone the right to stay quiet when they are asked to confess a crime. Miranda’s lawyers argued that Miranda did not know about this right, and therefore his testimony
could not count as evidence in the trial.

THE RESULT
Since Miranda did not know about his 5th Amendment rights, his confession could not be used against him, and the Supreme Court ruled in his favor. The official court decision was over 60 pages long, but Chief Justice Earl Warren read the whole thing out loud for the court. It had two parts:

First, after the police arrest someone, they have to tell that person that they have the right to remain silent, just as it is stated in the 5th Amendment.

Second, the police also have to tell that person they have the right to use a lawyer in the trial and any time prior to that, and that if they cannot afford a lawyer, the government will provide them with one. These rights are both found in the 6th Amendment.

This is why you always hear police officers reciting these important rights whenever they arrest someone. They are called “Miranda Rights” today, named after Ernesto Miranda himself.

MIRANDA RIGHTS TODAY
The basic wording might sound familiar. “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you. Do you understand these rights as I have read them to you?” However, there are actually over 945 versions of the Miranda Rights! Every state and county can have its own wording.

Not only that, but the Miranda Rights also have to be translated into many different languages, in case the police arrest someone who does not speak English. There are also simplified versions, because it is important for minors
and the mentally disabled or mentally ill to understand their rights as well.

As it turns out, even 945 versions are not enough to make sure everyone understands what their rights really are. Some researchers have analyzed the wording of Miranda Rights from all over the country, and most versions are too complex for everyone to understand. Some are so complex, they are at the same reading level as a college accounting textbook!

It is extremely important that everyone can understand their right to remain silent and their right to be represented by a lawyer. The law says that, in order to use a suspect’s own confession against him, the court has to prove that the police read them their rights, they completely understood their rights, and that they chose to ignore those rights intentionally. The Constitution gave us these rights for a reason; make sure you understand them!

PART A: What does the word “convict” most closely mean as it is used in paragraph 2?
A. A person who has committed a crime
B. Deceiving someone as a legal tactic
C. To take someone to court
D. To find guilty of a crime
Mathematics
2 answers:
djverab [1.8K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

i think its d

Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

"Later during his trial, the prosecution used his confession as evidence to <u><em>convict  </em></u> him." <em>The word "convict" in the paragraph is used to find guilty of crime because used to CONFESSION :) enjoy</em>

You might be interested in
Who had this before if so can I get help
telo118 [61]

2*3+4=10

5+2x2=9

4-3+2=3

4*3+2=14

20-4x3+6=14

16-30/2+11=12

24/6*5=20

15/5+2=5

2+2*9-5=15

12-3+4*2=1

12/3+3*4=16

9-6/3=7

16-3*4=4

36/4/9=1

The last one is yours

6 0
3 years ago
Can you conclude from the figure that ABC is similar to DEF? Explain.​
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

Yes, we can conclude that Triangle ABC is similar to triangle DEF because the measures of the 3 angles of both triangles are congruent.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the measure of 2 angles from both triangles, and we know that triangles have 180°, so we can solve for the measure of the third angle for both triangles.

Triangle ABC:

Measure of angle A= 60°

Measure of angle C= 40°

Measure of angle B = 180°- (measure of angle A + measure of angle C) = 180° - (60° + 40°) = 80°

Triangle DEF

Measure of angle E= 80°

Measure of angle F= 40°

Measure of angle D= 180° - (measure of angle E + measure of angle F) = 180° - (80° + 40°) = 60°

The measures of the angles in Triangle ABC are: 60°, 40°, and 80°.

The measures of the angles in Triangle DEF are: 60°, 40°, and 80°.

Since the measure of 3 angles of the two triangles are the same, we know that the two triangles are similar.

8 0
3 years ago
A box's volume is equal to 600 cubic
olga2289 [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Length = x

width = x - 7

height = x - 10

volume = 600 in^3

Volume = L * w * h

600 = x * (x - 7)*(x - 10)

600 = x * (x^2 - 17x + 70)

600 = x^3 - 17x^2 + 70x

x^3 - 17x^2 + 70x - 600 = 0

There is a genius somewhere that could solve this using algebra. The rest of us have 2 choices. We can graph it (see below) or we could use a program that solves it for us. I'll do both for you.

a = 1

b  = - 17

c = 70

d = - 600

There is only 1 real solution: x = 15

L = 15

w = 8

h = 5

That has to be one of the ugliest graphs made. It does into the hundreds of thousands and it still looks like a straight line. Trust me. It's not.

3 0
3 years ago
&lt;3 and what is a linear pair
mylen [45]
A linear pair of angles is formed when two lines intersect. Two angles are said to be linear if they are adjacent angles formed by two intersecting lines. hope it helps
7 0
3 years ago
Suppose the sediment density (g/cm) of a randomly selected specimen from a certain region is normally distributed with mean 2.65
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

Probability that the sample average is at most 3.00 = 0.98030

Probability that the sample average is between 2.65 and 3.00 = 0.4803

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the sediment density (g/cm) of a randomly selected specimen from a certain region is normally distributed with mean 2.65 and standard deviation 0.85.

Also, a random sample of 25 specimens is selected.

Let X bar = Sample average sediment density

The z score probability distribution for sample average is given by;

               Z = \frac{Xbar-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } } ~ N(0,1)

where, \mu = population mean = 2.65

           \sigma  = standard deviation = 0.85

            n = sample size = 25

(a) Probability that the sample average sediment density is at most 3.00 is given by = P( X bar <= 3.00)

    P(X bar <= 3) = P( \frac{Xbar-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } } <= \frac{3-2.65}{\frac{0.85}{\sqrt{25} } } ) = P(Z <= 2.06) = 0.98030

(b) Probability that sample average sediment density is between 2.65 and 3.00 is given by = P(2.65 < X bar < 3.00) = P(X bar < 3) - P(X bar <= 2.65)

P(X bar < 3) = P( \frac{Xbar-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } } < \frac{3-2.65}{\frac{0.85}{\sqrt{25} } } ) = P(Z < 2.06) = 0.98030

 P(X bar <= 2.65) = P( \frac{Xbar-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } } <= \frac{2.65-2.65}{\frac{0.85}{\sqrt{25} } } ) = P(Z <= 0) = 0.5

Therefore, P(2.65 < X bar < 3)  = 0.98030 - 0.5 = 0.4803 .

                                                                             

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the distance between the points (-3, 5) and (6, -7)
    11·1 answer
  • For the given annual rate of​ change, find the corresponding growth or decay factor <br> +400%
    14·1 answer
  • Quickest answer gets Brainliest
    9·1 answer
  • What is the third term in this sequence?
    10·1 answer
  • Help!! I got a few mins left
    11·2 answers
  • Also, explain why and how you got it right and the one that's red is wrong
    13·1 answer
  • Lillian is going to invest in an account paying an interest rate of 5.7% compounded continuously. How much would Lillian need to
    7·1 answer
  • You deposit $800 in an account. The account earns $360 simple interest in 3 years. What is the annual interest rate?
    6·1 answer
  • You earn $48 for washing 6 cars. How much money do you earn for washing 3 cars
    8·1 answer
  • From the graph , determine the value of x when F(x) = 4
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!