2. I believe it would be two but then again this is an incomplete answer so it is not two. It's probably going to be 3. Or 1. Because I took this test before a while back and I'm almost a 100% sure it's 1 or 3. Hope this helps slightly!
<span>It changes with new evidence.
The example shows that science changes with new evidence. Science can not change with common beliefs because first of all beliefs should be proved and become evidence. Second, science is not fixed because of the scientific method and experimentation, which is a phase of the scientific method.
</span>
The answer is: when the aim is to show electron distributions in shells
An orbital notation is more appropriate if you want to show how the electrons of an atom are distributed in each subshell. This is because there are some atoms that have special electronic configurations that aren't obvious in just written configurations.
The scheme is shown below, the steps involved are as follow,
Step one: Reduction: The carbonyl group of given compound on reduction using
Wolf Kishner reagent converts the carbonyl group into -CH₂- group.
Step two: Epoxidation: The double bond present in starting compound when treated with
m-CPBA (<span>meta-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid) gives corrsponding epoxide.
Step three: Reduction: The epoxide is reduced to alcohol on treatment with
Lithium Aluminium Hydride (LiAlH</span>₄)<span> followed by hydrolysis.
Step four: Oxidation: The hydroxyl group (alcohol) is
oxidized to carbonyl (ketonic group) using oxidizing agent
Chromic acid (H</span>₂CrO₄).