Because if the the technique is wrong the scientist is wrong I’m sorry it’s a bad answer :(
Answer:
The answers to the question are
1. 2nd and above order order
2. 2nd order
3. 1/2 order
4. 1st order
5. 0 order
Explanation:
We have data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/754e1/754e17edb5971cda2800eb016482e217bfa125fb" alt="\frac{N}{N_{0} } = e^{-\lambda t}"
1. For nth order reaction half life
∝ ![\frac{1}{[A_{0} ]^{n-1} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5BA_%7B0%7D%20%5D%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%7D)
Therefore for a 0 order reaction increasing concentration of the reactant there will increase data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caefd/caefd3ad03e53ce4b880f7c8810dd19183879a32" alt="t_{\frac{1}{2} }"
First order reaction is independent [A₀].
Second order reaction [A₀] decrease, increase.
Similarly for a third order reaction
1. 2nd order
2. 2nd order reaction
3. Order of reaction is 1/2.
4. 1st order reaction.
5. Zero order reaction.
Answer:
It is higher in Norfolk because of the warm ocean currents from the south
Explanation:
Can I have brainliest answer please?
Answer:
C) The compound is largely ionic with A as the cation.
Explanation:
Pulings proposed the method to determine if the compound is ionic in nature or covalent in nature , by finding the difference between the electronegativity of the respective cation and anion .
The ion with higher electronegativity is the anion and the ion with lower electronegativity is the cation.
The electronegativity difference above 1.7 make the compound ionic in nature.
Hence, from the question ,
A is the cation and B is the anion.
And the electronegativity difference above 1.7 so the compound is ionic in nature.