. The velocity of a mass attached to a spring is given by v = (1.5 cm/s) sin(ωt + π/2), ..... Which of the following is the motion of objects moving in two dimensions
The absence of external force in the outer space, allows the piece of rock to continue moving at the same velocity for thousands of years.
<h3>Absence of external force on the outer space</h3>
The outer space is almost an absolute vacuum, because it's nearly empty. There is no matter such as air in the outer space that will provide an external force needed to change the velocity of the piece of rock.
From Newton's first law of motion, an object in a state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, will continue in that state unless it is acted upon by an external force.
Thus, the absence of external force in the outer space, allows the piece of rock to continue moving at the same velocity for thousands of years.
Learn more about outer space here: brainly.com/question/24701339
The voltage across an inductor ' L ' is
V = L · dI/dt .
I(t) = I(max) sin(ωt)
dI/dt = I(max) ω cos(ωt)
V = L · ω · I(max) cos(ωt)
L = 1.34 x 10⁻² H
ω = 2π · 60 = 377 /sec
I(max) = 4.80 A
V = L · ω · I(max) cos(ωt)
V = (1.34 x 10⁻² H) · (377 / sec) · (4.8 A) · cos(377 t)
<em>V = 24.25 cos(377 t)</em>
V is an AC voltage with peak value of 24.25 volts and frequency = 60 Hz.
Answer: Force applied by trampoline = 778.5 N
<em>Note: The question is incomplete.</em>
<em>The complete question is : What force does a trampoline have to apply to a 45.0 kg gymnast to accelerate her straight up at 7.50 m/s^2? note that the answer is independent of the velocity of the gymnast. She can be moving either up or down or be stationary.
</em>
Explanation:
The total required the trampoline by the trampoline = net force accelerating the gymnast upwards + force of gravity on her.
= (m * a) + (m * g)
= m ( a + g)
= 45 kg ( 7.50 * 9.80) m/s²
Force applied by trampoline = 778.5 N
Hey there!:
Here the Statement - D is correct.
Because Orbitals containing the core electrons are more attracted towards nuclear charge and hence less shilded from nuclear charge than an orbital that doesn't penetrate. Also due to more attraction between the orbital containing core electron and nucleus, it will have less energy.
Hope this helps!
