All categories

3 years ago

how might countries go about changing their CO2 emissions? What, if anything should be done about these countries C02 emissions?

1 answer:

3 0

1. Use renewable energy sources (eg. wind, solar etc.)
2. Encourage citizens to use public transport
3. Better waste management systems (instead of burning waste, recycle etc.)
that’s all i could think of :)

You might be interested in

Twin sisters Annie and Hannah are fighting

s344n2d4d5 [400]

Fnet = -25N + 30N = 5N
(25N is negative since left is negative)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

. (a) How high a hill can a car coast up (engine disengaged) if work done by friction is negligible and its initial speed is 110

7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

(a) the high of a hill that car can coast up (engine disengaged) if work done by friction is negligible and its initial speed is 110 km/h is 47.6 m

(b) thermal energy was generated by friction is 1.88 x $10^{5}$ J

(C) the average force of friction if the hill has a slope 2.5º above the horizontal is 373 N

Explanation:

given information:

m = 750 kg

initial velocity, $v_{0}$ = 110 km/h = 110 x 1000/3600 = 30.6 m/s $\frac{30.6^{2} }{2x9.8}$

initial height, $h_{0}$ = 22 m

slope, θ = 2.5°

(a) How high a hill can a car coast up (engine disengaged) if work done by friction is negligible and its initial speed is 110 km/h?

according to conservation-energy

EP = EK

mgh = $\frac{1}{2} mv_{0} ^{2}$

gh = $\frac{1}{2} v_{0} ^{2}$

h = $\frac{v_{0} ^{2} }{2g}$

= 47.6 m

(b) If, in actuality, a 750-kg car with an initial speed of 110 km/h is observed to coast up a hill to a height 22.0 m above its starting point, how much thermal energy was generated by friction?

thermal energy = mgΔh

= mg (h - $h_{0}$ )

= 750 x 9.8 x (47.6 - 22)

= 188160 Joule

= 1.88 x $10^{5}$ J

(c) What is the average force of friction if the hill has a slope 2.5º above the horizontal?

f d = mgΔh

f = mgΔh / d,

where h = d sin θ, d = h/sinθ

therefore

f = (mgΔh) / (h/sinθ)

= 1.88 x $10^{5}$ /(22/sin 2.5°)

= 373 N

8 0

3 years ago

Am 1 years old UwU (JK 15)

igomit [66]

Answer:

so am i ._. 15 not 1 ofc lol

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is a false statement about dispersion forces? View Available Hint(s) Which of the following is a false st

icang [17]

Explanation :

Dispersion forces are also known as London dispersion forces. It is the weakest force. Also, it is the part of the Van der Waals forces.

(1) This force is exhibited by all atoms and molecules.

(2) These forces are the result of the fluctuations in the electron distribution within molecules or atoms. Due to these fluctuations, the electric field is created. The magnitude of this force is explained in terms of Hamaker constant 'A'.

(3) Dispersion forces result from the formation of instantaneous dipoles in a molecule or atom. When electrons are more concentrated in a place, instantaneous dipoles formed.

(4) Dispersion force magnitude depends on the amount of surface area available for interactions. If the area increases, the size of the atom also increase. As a result, stronger dispersion forces.

So, the false statement is "Dispersion forces always have a greater magnitude in molecules with a greater molar mass".

4 0

3 years ago

when do you use cos and sin in situations like these? is horizontal always cos and vertical always sin?

Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

this is simple

the horizontal line is adjacent

the vertical line is opposite

recall that cos x=adj/hyp

adj=hyp(cos x)

while opp=hyp(sin x)

8 0

3 years ago