Answer:
I believe the answer The case study was influenced by bias, and led to incorrect conclusions being drawn. plz correct me if I am wrong
Explanation:
The formula for rubidium nitride is RbNO3.
It is C 2 1 2 1
You have to 1st balance the nitrates then balance the silvers to get the coefficients
Answer:
H+(aq) + OH-(aq) → H2O(l)
Explanation:
Step 1: Data given
nitrious acid = HNO3
sodium hydroxide = NaOH
Step 2: The unbalance equation
HNO3(aq) + NaOH(aq) →NaNO3(aq) + H2O(l)
The net ionic equation, for which spectator ions are omitted - remember that spectator ions are those ions located on both sides of the equation - will , after canceling those spectator ions in both side (Ba^2+ and Br-), look like this:
H+(aq) + NO3-(aq) + Na+(aq) + OH-(aq) →Na+(aq) +NO3(aq) + H2O(l)
H+(aq) + OH-(aq) → H2O(l)
Decreasing the temperature in the reaction vessel keep this reaction from shifting to form more of the product.
As we know that rate of reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of the reactant.
If we increase the concentration of H2 then the rate of reaction increases. So, we keep it constant. Therefore this option is wrong.
By removing the H₂O from the reaction vessel as it almost make no change in the reaction. This can be pursuited the reaction in which product again converted into product.
By increasing the temperature we increases the rate of reaction and equilibrium shift in the forward direction.
Thus, we concluded that by decreasing the temperature in the reaction vessel keep this reaction from shifting to form more of the product.
learn more about rate of reaction:
brainly.com/question/8592296
#SPJ13
