I think it's B because when you graph you do see the relationship between the dependent and independent variable
<span>Since there is no friction, conservation of energy gives change in energy is zero
Change in energy = 0
Change in KE + Change in PE = 0
1/2 x m x (vf^2 - vi^2) + m x g x (hf-hi) = 0
1/2 x (vf^2 - vi^2) + g x (hf-hi) = 0
(vf^2 - vi^2) = 2 x g x (hi - hf)
Since it starts from rest vi = 0
Vf = squareroot of (2 x g x (hi - hf))
For h1, no hf
Vf = squareroot of (2 x g x (hi - hf))
Vf = squareroot of (2 x 9.81 x 30)
Vf = squareroot of 588.6
Vf = 24.26
For h2
Vf = squareroot of (2 x 9.81 x (30 – 12))
Vf = squareroot of (9.81 x 36)
Vf = squareroot of 353.16
Vf = 18.79
For h3
Vf = squareroot of (2 x 9.81 x (30 – 20))
Vf = squareroot of (20 x 9.81)
Vf = 18.79</span>
The formula for kinetic energy = ½m·v<span>2
1/2 * 55 kg x 5,87 m/s ^2 = 27.5 x </span>34.4569 = <span>947.56475 Joule </span>≈ 948 J
Answer:
Kinetic energy = (1/2) (mass) (speed²)
Original KE = (1/2) (1430 kg) (7.5 m/s)² = 40,218.75 joules
Final KE = (1/2) (1430 kg) (11.0 m/s)² = 86,515 joules
Work done during the acceleration = (40218.75 - 86515) = 46,296.25 joules
Power = work/time = 46,296.25 joules / 9.3 sec = 4,978.1 watts .
Explanation:
Dont report my answer please
The correct answer is D He could pull the mass down farther.
Amplitude, is the maximum displacement or distance moved by a point on a vibrating body or wave measured from its equilibrium position. So to increase the amplitude the spring should be pulled down further which can increase the amplitude.
