How long did the trip from camp wood to the pacific ocean and back again take?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
1)
The electrostatic force between two charges is given by
(1)
where
k is the Coulomb's constant
q1, q2 are the two charges
r is the separation between the charges
When the two spheres are brought in contact with each other, the charge equally redistribute among the two spheres, such that each sphere will have a charge of
where Q is the total charge between the two spheres.
So we can actually rewrite the force as
And since we know that
r = 1.41 m (distance between the spheres)
(the sign is positive since the charges repel each other)
We can solve the equation for Q:
So, the final charge on the sphere on the right is
2)
Now we know the total charge initially on the two spheres. Moreover, at the beginning we know that
(we put a negative sign since the force is attractive, which means that the charges have opposite signs)
r = 1.41 m is the separation between the charges
And also,
So we can rewrite eq.(1) as
Solving for q1,
Since , we can substituting all numbers into the equation:
which gives two solutions:
Which correspond to the values of the two charges. Therefore, the initial charge q1 on the first sphere is
Answer:
Yes, it will produce a diffraction pattern.
a. 3.9 mm b. 1.95 mm
Explanation:
The light shined from a single slit will produce a diffraction pattern because, the wavefront act as wavelets which generates its own wave according to Huygens principle. This therefore causes the diffraction pattern.
Given
wavelength of green light, λ = 520 nm = 520 × 10⁻⁹ m = 5.20 × 10⁻⁷ m
width of slit, d = 0.440 mm = 0.44 × 10⁻³ m = 4.4 × 10⁻⁴ m
Distance of slit from central maximum , D = 1.65 m
Distance of first minimum from central maximum, y = ?
a. The relationship between the slit width and wavelength is given by [tex} dsinθ = mλ [/tex]where d = slit width, θ = angular distance from central maximum, λ = wavelength of light and m = ±1, ±2, ±3...
The relationship between y and D is given by
Since θ is small, sinθ ≈ θ ≈ tanθ
so, dθ = mλ ⇒ θ = mλ/d = y/D
Therefore, y = mλD/d
Now, for the first minimum above the slit, m = +1 and for the first minimum below the slit, m = -1. So, y₁ = λD/d and y₋₁ = -λD/d. So, the width of the central maximum Δy is the difference between the first minima below and above the central maximum. So, Δy = y₁ - y₋₁ = λD/d -(-λD/d) = 2λD/d
Substituting the values from above, Δy= 2 × 5.20 × 10⁻⁷ × 1.65/4.4 × 10⁻⁴ = 3900 × 10⁻⁶ m = 3.9 × 10⁻³ m = 3.9 mm
b. The first order fringe is the fringe located between the first minimum and the second minimum. From dsinθ = mλ and tanθ = y/D when θ is small, sinθ ≈ θ ≈ tanθ. So, y = mλD/d. Let m= 1 and m=2 be the first and second minima respectively. So,y₁ = λD/d and y₂ = 2λD/d. The difference Δy₁ = y₂ - y₁ is the width of the first order fringe. Therefore, Δy₁ = 2λD/d - λD/d= λD/d. Substituting the values from above, we have
λD/d= 5.20 × 10⁻⁷ × 1.65/4.4 × 10⁻⁴= 1.95 × 10⁻³ m = 1.95 mm