Answer:
Similarities:
- Both are based on observation.
- Both are supported by empirical data
- Both are tested repeatedly
- Both are accepted by science
- Both are based on natural phenomena
Differences:
- Scientific law just describes a phenomenon. It does not give an explanation as to why the phenomenon occurs. It predicts an outcome of an event based on its initial condition.
- Scientific theory gives an explanation as to why an event had occurred.
- Laws are more resistant to change.
- Theories can be refuted and accepted, and develop other theories as well
Take note:
A scientific theory cannot be "upgraded" into a law, and a scientific law cannot be changed into a theory.
The chloroplast of the cell is most likely damaged if the plant cell is no longer capable of capturing energy from sunlight and converting it into chemical energy.
The chloroplast is the structure inside the leaf cell that is known for capturing light energy from the sun.
This light energy is then used to make food that has chemical energy. If a plant cell has a damaged chloroplast or the chloroplast is removed, then it will no longer be able to trap the light energy. As a result, the process of photosynthesis will not occur in the plant cell. The plant cell will not be able to make the chemical energy required for functioning.
To learn more about chloroplast, click here:
brainly.com/question/1741612
#SPJ4
Answer: car B has travelled 4times as far as Car A
d=vi*t+1/2at^2
No initial velocity so equation becomes;
d=1/2at^2 and the acceleration is the same between both only time is different;
Car A d=1/2a(1)^2
Car B d=1/2a(2)^2
Car A d= 1^2=1
Car B d= 2^2=4
Car B d=4*Car A
So car B has travelled 4 times as far as car A
Btw only someone who is nice will answer tour question. You can't expect for explanition when the question is only worth 5 points. Not trying to be mean sorry if i am being mean
The percentage of the drink that finds the target and lands in your mouth.
