1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rzqust [24]
3 years ago
12

A driver is moving at 17.0 m/s when she sees a child on a bike 65m ahead of her. If the car can brake at 4.9 m/s^2 and the drive

rs reaction time is 1.6 s, can she avoid hitting the child
Physics
1 answer:
Lera25 [3.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The driver can  avoid the child because at the time she brake 1.6s the car just move 20.928 meters so is far to the 65 meters where the kind is

Distance= 20.928 m

Explanation:

V_{o} = 17 \frac{m}{s} \\a= -4.9 \frac{m}{s^{2} }\\ t= 1.6 s

Distance the kid is 65m so the car have to be less in the time she is braking

So to calculated the distance while she is braking

X_{f} = X_{o} +V_{o}*t + \frac{1}{2} * a *t^{2}\\ X_{f} = 0m +17 \frac{m}{s} *1.6 s + \frac{1}{2} * 4.9 \frac{m}{s^{2} } *(1.6s)^{2}\\X_{f} = 27.2 m+ (-6.272 m)\\X_{f} = 20.928 m

The distance of the car is less than the distance of the kid in his bike

So she didn't hit him

You might be interested in
Which of the following best expresses the definition of mass?
sergey [27]
The quantity of matter in a body regardless of its volume or of any forces acting on it.
4 0
3 years ago
John walks 1.00 km north, then turns right and walks 1.00 km east. His speed is 1.50 m/s during the entire stroll.a) What is the
avanturin [10]

Answer:

(a) 1.414 km

(b) 1.06 m/s

Explanation:

(a) For John:

Distance = 1 km north and then 1 km east

Speed = 1.5 m/s

total distance traveled = 1 + 1 = 2 km = 2000 m

Time taken to travel = Distance / speed

t = 2000 / 1.5 = 1333.3 seconds

Displacement = \sqrt{1^{2}+1^{2}}=1.414 km

(b) For jane :

Time is same as john = 1333.33 second

Distance = 1.414 km = 1414 m

Speed = distance / time = 1414 / 1333.33 = 1.06 m/s

3 0
3 years ago
At the moment t = 0, a 20.0 V battery is connected to a 5.00 mH coil and a 6.00 Ω resistor. (a) Immediately thereafter, how does
insens350 [35]

(a) On the coil: 20 V, on the resistor: 0 V

The sum of the potential difference across the coil and the potential difference across the resistor is equal to the voltage provided by the battery, V = 20 V:

V = V_R + V_L

The potential difference across the inductance is given by

V_L(t) = V e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}} (1)

where

\tau = \frac{L}{R}=\frac{0.005 H}{6.00 \Omega}=8.33\cdot 10^{-4} s is the time constant of the circuit

At time t=0,

V_L(0) = V e^0 = V = 20 V

So, all the potential difference is across the coil, therefore the potential difference across the resistor will be zero:

V_R = V-V_L = 20 V-20 V=0

(b) On the coil: 0 V, on the resistor: 20 V

Here we are analyzing the situation several seconds later, which means that we are analyzing the situation for

t >> \tau

Since \tau is at the order of less than milliseconds.

Using eq.(1), we see that for t >> \tau, the exponential becomes zero, and therefore the potential difference across the coil is zero:

V_L = 0

Therefore, the potential difference across the resistor will be

V_R = V-V_L = 20 V- 0 = 20 V

(c) Yes

The two voltages will be equal when:

V_L = V_R (2)

Reminding also that the sum of the two voltages must be equal to the voltage of the battery:

V=V_L +V_R

And rewriting this equation,

V_R = V-V_L

Substituting into (2) we find

V_L = V-V_L\\2V_L = V\\V_L=\frac{V}{2}=10 V

So, the two voltages will be equal when they are both equal to 10 V.

(d) at t=5.77\cdot 10^{-4}s

We said that the two voltages will be equal when

V_L=\frac{V}{2}

Using eq.(1), and this last equation, this means

V e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}} = \frac{V}{2}

And solving the equation for t, we find the time t at which the two voltages are equal:

e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}=\frac{1}{2}\\-\frac{t}{\tau}=ln(1/2)\\t=-\tau ln(0.5)=-(8.33\cdot 10^{-4} s)ln(0.5)=5.77\cdot 10^{-4}s

(e-a) -19.2 V on the coil, 19.2 V on the resistor

Here we have that the current in the circuit is

I_0 = 3.20 A

The problem says this current is stable: this means that we are in a situation in which t>>\tau, so the coil has no longer influence on the circuit, which is operating as it is a normal circuit with only one resistor. Therefore, we can find the potential difference across the resistor using Ohm's law

V=I_0 R = (3.20 A)(6.0 \Omega)=19.2 V

Then the battery is removed from the circuit: this means that the coil will discharge through the resistor.

The voltage on the coil is given by

V_L(t) = -V e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}} (1)

which means that it is maximum at the moment when the battery is disconnected, when t=0:

V_L(0)=.V

And V this time is the voltage across the resistor, 19.2 V (because the coil is now connected to the resistor, not to the battery). So, the voltage across the coil will be -19.2 V, and the voltage across the resistor will be the same in magnitude, 19.2 V (since the coil and the resistor are connected to the same points in the circuit): however, the signs of the potential difference will be opposite.

(e-b) 0 V on both

After several seconds,

t>>\tau

If we use this approximation into the formula

V_L(t) = -V e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}} (1)

We find that

V_L = 0

And since now the resistor is directly connected to the coil, the voltage in the resistor will be the same as the coil, so 0 V. This means that the coil has completely discharged, and current is no longer flowing through the circuit.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of the conclusion phase of the scientific method?
Burka [1]

Answer:

a scientist examines the results and answers the lab question- last choice

5 0
3 years ago
When running your engine, you cause debris, rocks and propeller blast to be directed towards people or other aircraft. Is this c
beks73 [17]

Answer:

Yes, it is reckless. This is because it is the responsibility of the pilot to make sure that the direction of the propeller blast is away from people or other aircraft and in a safe direction.

Explanation:

Yes, it is reckless to let the propeller blast face people and other aircraft. This is because it is the responsibility of the pilot to make sure that the direction of the propeller blast is away from people or other aircraft and in a safe direction. People and other aircraft can be injured by the debris and the rocks that are scattered by the engine of the aircraft.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which would be a common-sense practice in a lab environment?
    13·1 answer
  • Which tower is more likely to fall?
    9·2 answers
  • A paleontologist measures the ratio of carbon-14 to carbon-12 in a fossil skull found at a site. What technique is he using and
    15·1 answer
  • You are tossing a ball directly up into the air. Before the ball leaves your hand, you are exerting a force directed against the
    9·1 answer
  • A good baseball pitcher can throw a baseball toward home plate at 87 mi/h with a spin of 1710 rev/min. How many revolutions does
    9·1 answer
  • Noise levels at 5 airports were measured in decibels yielding the following data: 147,123,119,161,136 Construct the 99% confiden
    11·1 answer
  • Which substance is a heterogeneous mixture?
    9·1 answer
  • PLS HELP!! IN QUIZ RN!
    5·1 answer
  • Gravity prevents planets from flying off at a
    7·1 answer
  • Which part of the planet had the highest concentration of ozone in 1989?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!