Answer:
A. Identify the need, recognize limitations of current toothpaste containers, and then brainstorm ideas on how to improve the existing
Explanation:
To design an improved toothpaste container, we must identify the needs of the customer, one of the major need is to make the container attractive to the sight. This is the first thing that will prompt a customer to wanting to buy the product (The reflectance/appearance).
Then recognize the limitation of the current design, what needed change. This will help in determining what is needed to be included and what should be removed based on identified customers need.
The last step is to brainstorm ideas on how to improve the existing designs. Get ideas from other colleagues because there is a saying that two heads are better than one. This will help in coming to a reasonable conclusion on the new design after taking careful consideration of people's opinion.
Answer:21.3%
Explanation:
Given
80 % reduction in tool life
According to Taylor's tool life
=c
where V is cutting velocity
T=tool life of tool
80 % tool life reduction i.e. New tool Life is 0.2T
Thus
=1.213V
Thus a change of 21.3 %(increment) is required to reduce tool life by 80%
Answer:
Fatigue factor of safety is 2.0267
Explanation:
Solution is attached below.
Answer:
The flow of a real fluid has <u>more</u> complexity as compared to an ideal fluid owing to the phenomena caused by existence of <u>viscosity</u>
Explanation:
For a ideal fluid we know that there is no viscosity of the fluid hence the boundary condition need's not to be satisfied and the flow occur's without any head loss due to viscous nature of the fluid. The friction of the pipe has no effect on the flow of an ideal fluid. But for a real fluid the viscosity of the fluid has a non zero value, the viscosity causes boundary layer effects, causes head loss and also frictional losses due to pipe friction hugely make the analysis of the flow complex. The losses in the energy of the flow becomes complex to calculate as frictional losses depend on the roughness of the pipe and Reynolds number of the flow thus increasing the complexity of the analysis of flow.
