If earth were a ping pong what size ball would jupiter be

Three charges, Q1, Q2, and Q3 are located in a straight line. The position of Q2 is 0.301 m to the right of Q1. Q3 is located 0.

Alexxx [7]

Answer and Explanation: A charge exerts a force over another charge even if they are very far apart. This force is called <u>Electrostatic</u> <u>Force</u>.

If the two charges have the same sign, e.g. both aare positive, the force between them is opposite. If they have opposite sign, the force is towards each other. In other words, for electrostatic force, equal charges repel and different charges attract.

So,

1. If Q2 and Q3 have opposite signs, it is TRUE force in Q2 will go the left;

2. If the 2 are negative, they have the same sign, so it's FALSE force is to the right;

Sentences 3 and 4 are also TRUE due to the reasons described above;

5. If the charges have opposite signs, it means force is towards each other, or, to the right, so the sentence is TRUE;

1. Force is directly proportional to charges in Coulomb [C] and inversely proportional to distance squared in [m]:

$F=\frac{k.q.Q}{r^{2}}$

where k is a constant that equals 9 x 10⁹ N.m²/C²

Calculating force between 1 and 2:

$F_{12}=\frac{9.10^{9}(1.9.10^{-6})(2.84.10^{-6})}{(0.301)^{2}}$

$F_{12}=536.02.10^{-3}$ N

Force between 2 and 3:

$F_{23}=\frac{9.10^{9}(2.84.10^{-6})(3.03.10^{-6})}{(0.169)^{2}}$

$F_{23}=2711.63.10^{-3}$ N

Total force is the net force. Since Q2 is negative and the others are positive, force of 2 related to 1 is to left and related to 3 is to the right. Therefore, total force is the difference between those two forces:

$F_{T}=2711.63.10^{-3}-536.02.10^{-3}$

$F_{T}=2175.61.10^{-3}$ N

The total force on Q2 is 2175.61 x 10⁻³ N

2. For net force to be 0, $F_{13}=F_{23}$ . Suppose distance from 1 to 3 is x, then from 2 to 3 is $x-0.301$

Calculating:

$\frac{k(1.90.10^{-6})(3.03.10^{-6})}{x^{2}}=\frac{k(2.84.10^{-6})(3.03.10^{-6})}{(x-0.301)^{2}}$

$\frac{5.757.10^{-12}}{x^{2}} =\frac{8.6052.10^{-12}}{x^{2}-0.602x+0.090601}$

$\frac{5.757.10^{-12}}{8.6052.10^{-12}}=\frac{x^{2}}{x^{2}-0.602x+0.090601}$

$x^{2}=0.67x^{2}-0.40x+0.061$

$0.33x^{2}+0.40x-0.061=0$

roots = 0.14 or -1.35

Solving quadratic equation gives 2 roots, but one of the roots is negative. As distance is a measure that cannot be negative, the solution is x = 0.14.

The distance of Q3 relative to Q1 is 0.14 m

4 0

3 years ago

What type of galaxy is shown?

dexar [7]

Elliptical, because the shape of the galaxy isn’t like the others. It is unique to its own and doesn’t have another to compare to

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What Is a Sound Wave? Learning Goal: To understand the nature of a sound wave, including its properties: frequency wavelength, l

NISA [10]

Answer:

A) Propagation of pressure fluctuations in a medium

B) air is the medium in which the wave is transported,

Explanation:

Part A.

A sound wave is a longitudinal oscillation of the molecules that forms in a material medium, they can be solid, liquid or gases, therefore the wave propagates in the same direction as the oscillation of the particles.

The most correct answer is:

* Propagation of pressure fluctuations in a medium

Part b

air is the medium in which the wave is transported, otherwise it cannot propagate

8 0

3 years ago

Can you have zero displacement and nonzero average velocity? Zero displacement and nonzero velocity? Illustrate your answers on

Svetlanka [38]

a) Not possible

b) Yes, it's possible (see graph in attachment)

Explanation:

a)

The average velocity of a body is defined as the ratio between the displacement and the time elapsed:

$v=\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}$

where

$\Delta x$ is the displacement

$\Delta t$ is the time elapsed

In this problem, we want to have zero displacement and non-zero average velocity. From the equation above, we see that this is not possible. In fact, if the total displacement is zero,

$\Delta x = 0$

And therefore as a consequence,

$v=0$

which means that the average velocity is zero.

B)

Here we want to have zero displacement and non-zero velocity. In this case, it is possible: in fact, we are not talking about average velocity, but we are talking about (instantaneous) velocity.

On a position-time graph, the instantaneous velocity is the slope of the graph. Look at the graph in attachment. We see that the position of the object first increases towards positive value, then it decreases (the object starts moving backward), then becomes negative, then it increases again until returning to the original position, x = 0.

In all of this, we notice that the total displacement of the object is zero:

$\Delta x = 0$

However, we notice that the instantaneous velocity of the object at the various instants is not zero, because the slope of the graph is not zero.

Learn more about average velocity:

brainly.com/question/8893949

brainly.com/question/5063905

#LearnwithBrainly